Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 27;16(1):186-195.
doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i1.186.

Micro-power negative pressure wound technique reduces risk of incision infection following loop ileostomy closure

Affiliations

Micro-power negative pressure wound technique reduces risk of incision infection following loop ileostomy closure

Deng-Yong Xu et al. World J Gastrointest Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Prophylactic loop ileostomy is an effective way to reduce the clinical severity of anastomotic leakage following radical resection of rectal cancer. Incisional surgical site infection (SSI) is a common complication after ileostomy closure.

Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the micro-power negative pressure wound technique (MPNPWT) in preventing incisional SSI.

Methods: This was a prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial conducted at a single center. A total of 101 consecutive patients who underwent ileostomy closure after rectal cancer surgery with a prophylactic ileostomy were enrolled from January 2019 to December 2021. Patients were randomly allocated into an MPNPWT group and a control group. The MPNPWT group underwent intermittent suturing of the surgical incision with 2-0 Prolene and was covered with a micro-power negative pressure dressing. The surgical outcomes were compared between the MPNPWT (n = 50) and control (n = 51) groups. Risk factors for incisional SSI were identified using logistic regression.

Results: There were no differences in baseline characteristics between the MPNPWT (n = 50) and control groups (n = 51). The incisional SSI rate was significantly higher in the control group than in the MPNPWT group (15.7% vs 2.0%, P = 0.031). However, MPNPWT did not affect other surgical outcomes, including intra-abdominal complications, operative time, and blood loss. Postoperative hospital stay length and hospitalization costs did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = 0.069 and 0.843, respectively). None of the patients experienced adverse effects of MPNPWT, including skin allergy, dermatitis, and pain. MPNPWT also helped heal the infected incision. Our study indicated that MPNPWT was an independent protective factor [odds ratio (OR) = 0.005, P = 0.025)] and diabetes was a risk factor (OR = 26.575, P= 0.029) for incisional SSI.

Conclusion: MPNPWT is an effective and safe way to prevent incisional SSI after loop ileostomy closure.

Keywords: Ileostomy closure; Incisional surgical site infection; Infection prevention; Micro-power negative pressure technique; Postoperative incision.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest statement: All authors declare no potential conflicting interests related to this paper.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Composition and working principle of micro-power negative pressure wound technique. A: The wound dressing is made of a special polyvinyl alcohol foam material. The material covers the wound and is sealed by a medical transparent film. In this way, it becomes a three-layer dressing containing a medical film layer, liquid locking layer, and micro-power vacuum and pumping effect layer; B: When exudates are absorbed into the liquid locking layer, the dressing expands, and the medical film layer is elevated. Then the closed space becomes larger and forms a local micro-power vacuum, which exerts negative pressure attraction on the wound and its deep soft tissue.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Incision equipped with micro-power negative pressure wound dressing. A: During the surgery, the incision was intermittently sutured with 2-0 Prolene with a 10-12 mm needle spacing in the micro-power negative pressure wound technique group; B: Then the micro-power negative pressure wound dressing was equipped immediately; C: When exudates were absorbed, they appeared on the the material’s surface, and the dressing expanded; D: A clean and dry incision was obtained after removing the material in 72 h.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Consort diagram.

References

    1. Mrak K, Uranitsch S, Pedross F, Heuberger A, Klingler A, Jagoditsch M, Weihs D, Eberl T, Tschmelitsch J. Diverting ileostomy versus no diversion after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: A prospective, randomized, multicenter trial. Surgery. 2016;159:1129–1139. - PubMed
    1. Akiyoshi T, Fujimoto Y, Konishi T, Kuroyanagi H, Ueno M, Oya M, Yamaguchi T. Complications of loop ileostomy closure in patients with rectal tumor. World J Surg. 2010;34:1937–1942. - PubMed
    1. Lee JR, Kim YW, Sung JJ, Song OP, Kim HC, Lim CW, Cho GS, Jung JC, Shin EJ. Conventional Linear versus Purse-string Skin Closure after Loop Ileostomy Reversal: Comparison of Wound Infection Rates and Operative Outcomes. J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2011;27:58–63. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fukuoka K, Koyama F, Kuge H, Obara S, Nakamoto T, Iwasa Y, Takei T, Matsumoto Y, Sadamitsu T, Sho M. A combination of subcuticular sutures and subcutaneous closed-suction drainage reduces the risk of incisional surgical site infection in loop ileostomy closure. Surg Today. 2021;51:605–611. - PubMed
    1. Zheng XP, Chen J, Chen TS, Jiang YN, Shen T, Xiao SC, Hu XY. [Preliminary effect observation on the application of micro-negative pressure in children with small-area deep partial-thickness burn] Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2019;35:720–725. - PubMed