What Are the Diagnosis-Specific Thresholds of Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State in Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty?
- PMID: 38331359
- DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.01.051
What Are the Diagnosis-Specific Thresholds of Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State in Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty?
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) thresholds for Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) pain, physical short form (PS), and joint replacement (JR) 1 year after primary total hip arthroplasty stratified by preoperative diagnosis of osteoarthritis (OA) versus non-OA.
Methods: A prospective institutional cohort of 5,887 patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty (January 2016 to December 2018) was included. There were 4,184 patients (77.0%) who completed a one-year follow-up. Demographics, comorbidities, and baseline and one-year HOOS pain, PS, and JR scores were recorded. Patients were stratified by preoperative diagnosis: OA or non-OA. Minimal detectable change (MDC) and MCIDs were estimated using a distribution-based approach. The PASS values were estimated using an anchor-based approach, which corresponded to a response to a satisfaction question at one year post surgery.
Results: The MCID thresholds were slightly higher in the non-OA cohort versus OA patients. (HOOS-Pain: OA: 8.35 versus non-OA: 8.85 points; HOOS-PS: OA: 9.47 versus non-OA: 9.90 points; and HOOS-JR: OA: 7.76 versus non-OA: 8.46 points). Similarly, all MDC thresholds were consistently higher in the non-OA cohort compared to OA patients. The OA cohort exhibited similar or higher PASS thresholds compared to the non-OA cohort for HOOS-Pain (OA: ≥80.6 versus non-OA: ≥77.5 points), HOOS-PS (OA: ≥83.6 versus non-OA: ≥83.6 points), and HOOS-JR (OA: ≥76.8 versus non-OA: ≥73.5 points). A similar percentage of patients achieved MCID and PASS thresholds regardless of preoperative diagnosis.
Conclusions: While MCID and MDC thresholds for all HOOS subdomains were slightly higher among non-OA than OA patients, PASS thresholds for HOOS pain and JR were slightly higher in the OA group. The absolute magnitude of the difference in these thresholds may not be sufficient to cause major clinical differences. However, these subtle differences may have a significant impact when used as indicators of operative success in a population setting.
Keywords: HOOS; MCID; Patient Acceptable Symptom State; THA; minimal clinically important difference; osteoarthritis.
Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Defining Patient-relevant Thresholds and Change Scores for the HOOS JR and KOOS JR Anchored on the Patient-acceptable Symptom State Question.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Apr 1;482(4):688-698. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002857. Epub 2023 Sep 29. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024. PMID: 37773026 Free PMC article.
-
Establishing minimal clinically important differences and patient acceptable symptom state thresholds following birmingham hip resurfacing.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Aug;144(8):3729-3737. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05443-x. Epub 2024 Jul 9. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024. PMID: 38981870 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnosis-Specific Thresholds of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State for KOOS After Total Knee Arthroplasty.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2024 May 1;106(9):793-800. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.23.00027. Epub 2024 Feb 21. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2024. PMID: 38381811
-
Discordance Abounds in Minimum Clinically Important Differences in THA: A Systematic Review.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Apr 1;481(4):702-714. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002434. Epub 2022 Oct 19. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023. PMID: 36398323 Free PMC article.
-
A systematic review of estimates of the minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptom state of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index in patients who underwent total hip and total knee replacement.Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2019 Oct;27(10):1408-1419. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2019.05.002. Epub 2019 May 13. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2019. PMID: 31096046
Cited by
-
Mapping the importance of each individual element accounted by HOOS and VR-12 on 1-year patient satisfaction after primary total hip arthroplasty: a prospective institutional analysis.Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 May 21;35(1):209. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04311-7. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025. PMID: 40399733 Free PMC article.
-
Femoral Nerve Palsy Following Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty in a Patient With Iliac Venous Stents: A Case Report.Cureus. 2025 Jun 26;17(6):e86799. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86799. eCollection 2025 Jun. Cureus. 2025. PMID: 40718308 Free PMC article.
-
Contralateral THAs More Than 1 Year Apart: Do PROMs and Healthcare Utilization Differ After Each Procedure?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 May 1;483(5):832-842. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003339. Epub 2024 Dec 6. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025. PMID: 39660679
-
Pain Assessment in Osteoarthritis: Present Practices and Future Prospects Including the Use of Biomarkers and Wearable Technologies, and AI-Driven Personalized Medicine.J Orthop Res. 2025 Jul;43(7):1217-1229. doi: 10.1002/jor.26082. Epub 2025 Apr 9. J Orthop Res. 2025. PMID: 40205648 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The variability of minimum clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptom state thresholds for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in the anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty literature: a systematic review.JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2025 Mar 6;5(3):497-505. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.01.012. eCollection 2025 Aug. JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2025. PMID: 40697307 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical