Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 8;10(1):19.
doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00525-3.

A framework for more equitable, diverse, and inclusive Patient and Public Involvement for palliative care research

Sarah Mitchell  1 , Nicola Turner  2 , Kate Fryer  3 , Jude Beng  3 , Margaret E Ogden  4 , Melanie Watson  5 , Clare Gardiner  5 , Joanne Bayly  4   6 , Katherine E Sleeman  4 , Catherine J Evans  4
Affiliations

A framework for more equitable, diverse, and inclusive Patient and Public Involvement for palliative care research

Sarah Mitchell et al. Res Involv Engagem. .

Abstract

Background: There are marked inequalities in palliative care provision. Research is needed to understand how such inequalities can be addressed, so that everyone living with advanced illness can receive the care they need, when they need it. Research into inequalities in palliative care should be guided by Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) that includes people from diverse backgrounds, who are less likely to receive specialist services. Multi-disciplinary research partnerships, bringing together primary care (the main providers of palliative care to diverse communities) and specialist palliative care, have the potential to work together in new ways to do research to address inequalities and improve palliative care in practice. This report describes a research partnership between primary care and palliative care that aimed to: (1) create opportunities for more inclusive PPI in palliative care research, (2) co-design new resources to support more equitable, diverse and inclusive PPI for palliative care, (3) propose a new framework for inclusive PPI in palliative care research.

Methods: PPI members were recruited via primary care and palliative care research networks from three diverse areas of the UK. A pragmatic, collaborative approach was taken to achieve the partnership aims. Online workshops were carried out to understand barriers to inclusive PPI in palliative care and to co-design resources. Evaluation included a "you said, we did" impact log and a short survey. The approach was informed by good practice principles from previous PPI, and existing theory relating to equity, equality, diversity, and inclusion.

Results: In total, 16 PPI members were recruited. Most were White British (n = 10), other ethnicities were Asian (n = 4), Black African (n = 1) and British mixed race (n = 1). The research team co-ordinated communication and activities, leading to honest conversations about barriers to inclusive PPI. Resources were co-designed, including a role description for an Equity, Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Champion, a "jargon buster", an animation and an online recipe book ( http://www.re-equipp.co.uk/ ) to inform future PPI. Learning from the partnership has been collated into a new framework to inform more inclusive PPI for future palliative care research.

Conclusion: Collaboration and reciprocal learning across a multi-disciplinary primary care and palliative care research partnership led to the development of new approaches and resources. Research team commitment, shared vision, adequate resource, careful planning, relationship building and evaluation should underpin approaches to increase equality, diversity and inclusivity in future PPI for palliative care research.

Keywords: Diversity; Equality; Equity; Inclusion; Inequalities; Palliative care; Patient and Public Involvement; Patient engagement; Primary care.

Plain language summary

Research is needed to understand how inequalities in palliative care can be addressed, so that everyone living with advanced illness can receive the care they need. Research into inequalities in palliative care should be guided by Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) that includes people from diverse backgrounds, who are less likely to receive specialist palliative care. Primary care services are grounded in the community they serve and can be the main providers of palliative care, but this is rarely the focus of research. Primary care and palliative care researchers can work together in new ways to do research to address inequalities and improve palliative care in practice. This paper describes the work of the RE-EQUIPP (REducing inEQUalities through Integration of Primary and Palliative Care) Care Partnership. The partnership involved researchers from primary care and palliative care working with people with lived experience of serious illness as patient or carer from three diverse areas of the United Kingdom: (1) London, (2) inner-city Sheffield and (3) Worthing in Sussex, a rural, coastal setting. The project provided opportunity to develop new ways of working and resources for more inclusive and equitable PPI for future palliative care research. Sixteen PPI members from diverse backgrounds and with a range of experience joined the partnership. Workshops were held to understand the barriers to inclusive PPI. New roles and resources were developed, including an Equity, Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Champion role, a “jargon buster”, an animation, and an online recipe book to inform future PPI. Learning from the partnership was used to develop a new framework, which is presented to inform inclusive PPI for palliative care research in the future. This outlines the need for research team commitment and shared vision, adequate resource, careful planning, relationship building and evaluation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

SM is the National Clinical Director for Palliative and End of Life Care for NHS England (Interim 1.5.23 -31.10.23).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Hub and Spoke model
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Theoretical framework
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Principles of sharing in PPI for Palliative Care
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
A framework for Equity, Equality, Diversity and Inclusion (EEDI) in PPI for palliative care research
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jackson T, Pinnock H, Liew SM, Horne E, Ehrlich E, Fulton O, et al. Patient and public involvement in research: from tokenistic box ticking to valued team members. BMC Med. 2020;18(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01544-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tobin J, Rogers A, Winterburn I, Tullie S, Kalyanasundaram A, Kuhn I, Barclay S. Hospice care access inequalities: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. BMJ Supp Palliative Care. 2022;12(2):142–51. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002719. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Buck J, Webb L, Moth L, Morgan L, Barclay S. Persistent inequalities in Hospice at Home provision. BMJ Supp Pall Care. 2020;10(3):e23. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2017-001367. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Davies JM, Sleeman KE, Leniz J, Wilson R, Higginson IJ, Verne J, et al. Socioeconomic position and use of healthcare in the last year of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS Med. 2019;16(4):e1002782. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002782. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bajwah S, Edmonds P, Yorganci E, Chester R, Russell K, Lovell N, et al. The association between ethnicity, socioeconomic deprivation and receipt of hospital-based palliative care for people with Covid-19: a dual centre service evaluation. Palliat Med. 2021;35(8):1514–1518. doi: 10.1177/02692163211022959. - DOI - PubMed