Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 8;7(1):29.
doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01021-y.

Beyond the 510(k): The regulation of novel moderate-risk medical devices, intellectual property considerations, and innovation incentives in the FDA's De Novo pathway

Affiliations

Beyond the 510(k): The regulation of novel moderate-risk medical devices, intellectual property considerations, and innovation incentives in the FDA's De Novo pathway

Mateo Aboy et al. NPJ Digit Med. .

Abstract

Moderate-risk medical devices constitute 99% of those that have been regulated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) since it gained authority to regulate medical technology nearly five decades ago. This article presents an analysis of the interaction between the 510(k) process -the historically dominant path to market for most medical devices- and the De Novo pathway, a more recent alternative that targets more novel devices, including those involving new technologies, diagnostics, hardware, and software. The De Novo pathway holds significant potential for innovators seeking to define new categories of medical devices, as it represents a less burdensome approach than would have otherwise been needed historically. Moreover, it supports the FDA in its effort to modernize the long-established 510(k) pathway by promoting the availability of up-to-date device "predicates" upon which subsequent device applications can be based, reflecting positive spillovers that are likely to encourage manufacturers to adopt current state-of-the-art technologies and modern standards of safety and effectiveness. We analyze the of characteristics all the De Novo classification requests to date, including the submission type, trends, FDA review times, and device types. After characterizing how the De Novo process has been used over time, we discuss its unique challenges and opportunities with respect to medical device software and AI-enabled devices, including considerations for intellectual property, innovation, and competition economics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Number of De Novo classification requests over time.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
FDA decision times for direct De Novo classification requests submitted from 1998 to 2023.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Classification of FDA De Novo requests (1997-2023) by application domain based on the FDA Medical Specialty (left) and by category (2017-2023) of medical device: hardware MD, software (SaMD), in vitro diagnostic (right).

References

    1. Medical Device Market. Facts & Factors, Vol. 282 (Medical Device Market, 2021).
    1. Darrow JJ, Avorn J, Kesselheim AS. FDA regulation and approval of medical devices: 1976–2020. JAMA. 2021;326:420–432. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.11171. - DOI - PubMed
    1. FDA. Premarket Notification 510(k). https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/premarket-submissions-selecting-and-... (2022).
    1. FDA. Device Classification Panels. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/classify-your-medical-device/device-... (2018).
    1. Garber AM. Modernizing device regulation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010;362:1161–1163. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1000447. - DOI - PubMed