Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 22;68(2):69-74.
doi: 10.17221/85/2022-VETMED. eCollection 2023 Feb.

Verification of accuracy of qPCR method for intravital diagnostics of Macrorhabdus ornithogaster in avian droppings

Lenka Vrbasova  1 , Dobromila Molinkova  2 , Petr Linhart  3 , Zdenek Knotek  1
Affiliations

Verification of accuracy of qPCR method for intravital diagnostics of Macrorhabdus ornithogaster in avian droppings

Lenka Vrbasova et al. Vet Med (Praha). .

Abstract

The objective of this study was to verify the accuracy of the quantitative PCR (qPCR) method for in vivo detection of Macrorhabdus ornithogaster. A total of 100 faecal and gastric mucosa samples from avian cadavers were investigated, using cytological and qPCR techniques (budgerigars, Fischer's lovebirds, red-crowned parakeets, scarlet-chested parrots, eastern rosellas, domestic canaries, zebra finches, white Java sparrow). Using qPCR, the probability of detecting positive samples of droppings was significantly higher than in the faecal smear microscopy (P < 0.01). Cytology detected the presence of Macrorhabdus ornithogaster in 34 faecal samples, whereas qPCR detected 54 positive samples. In all 46 qPCR negative faecal samples, gastric smear qPCR was performed and also yielded negative results. Gastric smear qPCR was also performed in 20 cadavers where faecal qPCR has detected the presence of Macrorhabdus ornithogaster and in all samples confirmed the positive result. This verifies the accuracy of faecal sample qPCR for intravital diagnostics. Overall, the faecal qPCR technique appears to be extremely reliable, as it made it possible to detect all infected individuals, including those with negative stool or gastric cytology.

Keywords: cytology; macrorhabdosis; passerines; psittacines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Baron HR, Stevenson BC, Phalen DN. Inconsistent efficacy of water-soluble amphotericin B for the treatment of Macrorhabdus ornithogaster in a budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus) aviary. Aust Vet J. 2020 Jul;98(7):333-7. - PubMed
    1. Borrelli L, Dipineto L, Rinaldi L, Romano V, Noviello E, Menna LF, Cringoli G, Fioretti A. New diagnostic insights for Macrorhabdus ornithogaster infection. J Clin Microbiol. 2015 Nov;53(11):3448-50. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Filippich LJ, Hendrikz JK. Prevalence of megabacteria in budgerigar colonies. Aust Vet J. 1998 Feb;76(2):92-5. - PubMed
    1. Gerlach H. Megabacteriosis. Semin Avian Exot Pet Med. 2001 Jan;10(1):12-9.
    1. Hanafusa Y, Bradley A, Tomaszewski EE, Libal MC, Phalen DN. Growth and metabolic characterization of Macrorhabdus ornithogaster. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2007 May;19(3):256-65. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources