Oncological outcomes in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: the value of PSA density as a preoperative predictive factor
- PMID: 38333072
- PMCID: PMC10851720
- DOI: 10.1177/17562872241229250
Oncological outcomes in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: the value of PSA density as a preoperative predictive factor
Abstract
Background: Pretreatment assessment of patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer (PCa) is essential for therapeutic decision-making. Currently available staging systems based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score, and clinical stage allow for determining the prognostic characteristics of these patients. Several studies have evaluated the preoperative use of prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) as a prognostic factor for further risk stratification. To date, the role of PSAD in this setting is still an object of debate.
Objectives: The present analysis aimed to assess the predictive potential of PSAD for adverse oncological outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and to compare its accuracy to preoperative PSA (pPSA).
Design and methods: We retrospectively reviewed 427 patients diagnosed with localized PCa who underwent RARP at a single institution between January 2015 and January 2020. Generating receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves, calculating areas under the curves (AUCs), and using a linear regression model, we analyzed the association of PSAD and pPSA with postoperative positive surgical margins (PSM), Gleason score ⩾ 7, persistent PSA, and biochemical recurrence (BCR), with a median follow-up of 47 months.
Results: PSAD showed a significant association with PSM (p < 0.0001), PSA persistence (p < 0.0001), and Gleason ⩾ 7 (p < 0.0001), without being statistically significant in predicting BCR (p = 0.098). The predictive value of PSAD was comparable to pPSA for outcomes of PSA persistence (AUC 0.727 versus 0.771) and Gleason ⩾ 7 (AUC 0.683 versus 0.649).
Conclusion: PSAD is a predictive factor for postoperative oncological outcomes of PSM, Gleason score ⩾ 7, and persistence of PSA. Despite the need for further studies, PSAD could be useful as a prognostic parameter in conjunction with established staging systems.
Keywords: oncological outcomes; prostate cancer; prostate-specific antigen; prostate-specific antigen density; robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Plain language summary
Oncological outcomes in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: the value of PSA density as a preoperative predictive factor Prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) has an established role in the diagnostic process of prostate cancer (PCa). However, controversy remains on the assessment of its value as a pretreatment prognostic factor. The aim of our study was to evaluate the predictive ability of PSAD for oncological outcomes in PCa patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and to compare with the value of preoperative PSA (pPSA). The present analysis showed a significant association of PSAD with positive surgical margins (PSM), Gleason Score >=7 and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) persistence after RARP. Moreover, PSAD demonstrated to perform comparably to pPSA in predicting the outcomes of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) and post-RARP PSA persistence. Therefore, PSAD is considered a preoperative predictive factor potentially useful in conjunction with other previously established prognostic criteria and clinical features.
© The Author(s), 2024.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Predictive factors and oncological outcomes of persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen in patients following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.J Robot Surg. 2017 Mar;11(1):37-45. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0606-8. Epub 2016 May 31. J Robot Surg. 2017. PMID: 27245233
-
The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.BJU Int. 2012 Jul;110(1):36-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10681.x. Epub 2011 Nov 15. BJU Int. 2012. PMID: 22085203
-
A risk grouping algorithm for predicting factors of persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen in patients following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Oct;75(10):e14495. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14495. Epub 2021 Jun 22. Int J Clin Pract. 2021. PMID: 34155724
-
Performance characteristics of prostate-specific antigen density and biopsy core details to predict oncological outcome in patients with intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.BMC Urol. 2017 Jun 23;17(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12894-017-0238-y. BMC Urol. 2017. PMID: 28645325 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term cancer control outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer treatment: a meta-analysis.Int Urol Nephrol. 2017 Jun;49(6):995-1005. doi: 10.1007/s11255-017-1552-8. Epub 2017 Feb 25. Int Urol Nephrol. 2017. PMID: 28238148 Review.
Cited by
-
Prostate-Specific Antigen Decline Rate in the First Month Is a Timely Predictive Factor for Biochemical Recurrence After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.Cancers (Basel). 2025 Mar 12;17(6):961. doi: 10.3390/cancers17060961. Cancers (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40149297 Free PMC article.
-
A machine learning model incorporating 18F-prostate-specific membrane antigen-1007 positron emission tomography/computed tomography and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for predicting prostate-specific antigen persistence in patients with prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 Jan 2;15(1):30-41. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-1149. Epub 2024 Dec 16. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025. PMID: 39839009 Free PMC article.
-
Secondary Analysis of PSA and BCR-Free Survival in Asian Prostate Cancer Patients.Cancer Manag Res. 2025 Jun 24;17:1205-1214. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S527092. eCollection 2025. Cancer Manag Res. 2025. PMID: 40584226 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Culp MB, Soerjomataram I, Efstathiou JA, et al.. Recent global patterns in prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates. Eur Urol 2020; 77: 38. - PubMed
-
- International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC); Data visualization tools for exploring the global cancer burden in 2020, https://gco.iarc.fr/roday/home (2020, accessed 22 January 2023).
-
- Mottet N, Cornford P, van den Bergh RCN, et al.. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer. The 2022 update. Eur Urol 2022. - PubMed
-
- Knipper S, Graefen M. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy – So successful because it is better or better because it is so successful? Eur Urol 2018; 1: 361–363. - PubMed
-
- Moreno Sierra J, Galante Romo MI, Senovilla Pérez JL, et al.. Oncologic outcomes in 408 consecutive patient cohort treated with da Vinci robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Actas Urol Esp 2020; 44: 179–186. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous