Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb;9(2):102240.
doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.102240. Epub 2024 Feb 9.

Clinical benefit of anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapies in advanced cancer in France: a population-based estimate from 2014 to 2021

Affiliations

Clinical benefit of anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapies in advanced cancer in France: a population-based estimate from 2014 to 2021

V Grumberg et al. ESMO Open. 2024 Feb.

Abstract

Background: In France, the potential benefit of new treatments is initially evaluated by the Haute Autorité de Santé to determine reimbursement and pricing, but rarely afterwards. Although immunotherapies (ITs) have considerably improved the survival of patients, few data are available on their long-term benefit at a population-treated level. The present retrospective study aimed to assess the clinical benefit of ITs compared to the previous standards of care (SoCs) in France from 2014 to 2021.

Materials and methods: To do this, we analyzed all ITs from the anti-programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death-ligand 1 [anti-PD-(L)1] class used in monotherapy or in association with another treatment available in early access or reimbursed in France between 2014 and 2021, regardless of indication. The number of patients initiating an IT was retrieved by year, drug and indication. Using extrapolated Kaplan-Meier curves, utility scores and the population treated, the clinical benefit was expressed as the number of deaths prevented (DP), life-years (LYs) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained compared to previous SoC.

Results: Across the period, five ITs were marketed in 21 indications related to eight primary tumor sites. Between 2014 and 2021, 132 924 patients initiated an IT. By December 2021, 16 173 (13 804-17 141) deaths were delayed compared to previous SoC, mainly in lung cancer. Compared to their SoC, ITs provided a gain of 37 316 (33 581-41 048) additional LYs and 27 709 (23 784-30 450) additional QALYs. Lung cancer was the driver indication with 70.6% of LYs and 68.4% of QALYs gained followed by melanoma with 18.7% and 20.4% of the gain, respectively.

Conclusions: Significant gains in DP, LYs and QALYs have been observed in France following the introduction of ITs.

Keywords: clinical benefit; immunotherapies; life-years; oncology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study methods. CEESP, Economic and Public Health Evaluation Committee; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Patients initiating per month per tumor type over the follow-up. HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; ICI, immune checkpoint inhibitor; NSCLC, non-small-cell lung cancer; RCC, renal cell carcinoma; SCCHN, squamous cell cancer of head and neck; SCLC, small-cell lung cancer; UC, urothelial carcinoma.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sung H., Ferlay H., Siegel C., et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–249. - PubMed
    1. Defossez G., Le Guyader-Peyrou S., Uhry Z., et al. Santé Publique France; Saint-Maurice: 2019. Estimations nationales de l’incidence et de la mortalité par cancer en France métropolitaine entre 1990 et 2018. Étude à partir des registres des cancers du réseau Francim. Volume 1 - Tumeurs solides. Compléments par localisation tumorale et sous-sites ou sous-types histologiques.
    1. Direction de la recherche, des études de l’évaluation et des statistiques. L’état de santé de la population en France. Rapport 2017. Principales causes de décès et de morbités; 2017.
    1. Cardoso R., Guo F., Heisser T. Colorectal cancer incidence, mortality, and stage distribution in European countries in the colorectal cancer screening era: an international population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22(7):1002–1013. - PubMed
    1. Levin T., Corley D., Jensen C., et al. Effects of organized colorectal cancer screening on cancer incidence and mortality in a large community-based population. Gastroenterology. 2018;155(5):1383–1391.e5. - PMC - PubMed