Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 May 7;54(5):507-515.
doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyae006.

The trajectory of prognostic cognition in patients with advanced cancer: is the traditional advance care planning approach desirable for patients?

Affiliations
Review

The trajectory of prognostic cognition in patients with advanced cancer: is the traditional advance care planning approach desirable for patients?

Takaaki Hasegawa et al. Jpn J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

Most patients with advanced cancer initially express a desire to be informed of their prognosis, and prognostic discussions between patients and their oncologists can trigger the subsequent trajectory of prognostic cognitions. On the continuum of prognostic cognition, including inaccurate/accurate prognostic awareness (awareness of incurability of cancer, terminal nature of illness or life expectancy) and prognostic acceptance (accepting one's prognosis), patients' perceptions of being informed of their prognosis by oncologists and patients' coping strategy for serious medical conditions regulate prognostic cognitions. However, nearly half of the patients with advanced cancer have poor prognostic awareness, and few patients achieve prognostic acceptance. These phenomena partly act as barriers to participation in advance care planning. When oncologists engage in advance care planning conversations, they must assess the patient's prognostic cognition and readiness for advance care planning. Considering the inaccurate prognostic awareness in a non-negligible proportion of patients and that astatic patients' preferences for future treatment and care are influenced by prognostic cognition, more research on decision-making support processes for high-quality and goal-concordant end-of-life care is needed along with research of advance care planning. In addition to making decisions regarding future medical treatment and care, oncologists must engage in continuous and dynamic goal-of-care conversations with empathic communication skills and compassion from diagnosis to end-of-life care.

Keywords: advance care planning; communication; end-of-life discussion; neoplasm; palliative care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The phase framework and changes in prognostic cognition. Prognostic cognition is not an all-or-nothing phenomenon, but a continuum that can change over time. This model comprises various phases: patient illness perception before diagnosis, accurate/inaccurate prognostic awareness, prognostic acceptance and readiness for end-of-life discussions, resulting in prognosis-based decision-making. Patients’ perceptions of being informed and coping strategies regulate their prognostic cognition. EOLd, end-of-life discussion.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Back AL. Patient-clinician communication issues in palliative care for patients with advanced cancer. J Clin Oncol 2020;38:866–76. 10.1200/JCO.19.00128. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Enzinger AC, Zhang B, Schrag D, Prigerson HG. Outcomes of prognostic disclosure: associations with prognostic understanding, distress, and relationship with physician among patients with advanced cancer. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:3809–16. 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.9239. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yun YH, Lee CG, Kim SY, et al. The attitudes of cancer patients and their families toward the disclosure of terminal illness. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:307–14. 10.1200/JCO.2004.07.053. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen CH, Kuo SC, Tang ST. Current status of accurate prognostic awareness in advanced/terminally ill cancer patients: systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Palliat Med 2017;31:406–18. 10.1177/0269216316663976. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vlckova K, Tuckova A, Polakova K, Loucka M. Factors associated with prognostic awareness in patients with cancer: a systematic review. Psychooncology 2020;29:990–1003. 10.1002/pon.5385. - DOI - PubMed