The trajectory of prognostic cognition in patients with advanced cancer: is the traditional advance care planning approach desirable for patients?
- PMID: 38336476
- PMCID: PMC11075734
- DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyae006
The trajectory of prognostic cognition in patients with advanced cancer: is the traditional advance care planning approach desirable for patients?
Abstract
Most patients with advanced cancer initially express a desire to be informed of their prognosis, and prognostic discussions between patients and their oncologists can trigger the subsequent trajectory of prognostic cognitions. On the continuum of prognostic cognition, including inaccurate/accurate prognostic awareness (awareness of incurability of cancer, terminal nature of illness or life expectancy) and prognostic acceptance (accepting one's prognosis), patients' perceptions of being informed of their prognosis by oncologists and patients' coping strategy for serious medical conditions regulate prognostic cognitions. However, nearly half of the patients with advanced cancer have poor prognostic awareness, and few patients achieve prognostic acceptance. These phenomena partly act as barriers to participation in advance care planning. When oncologists engage in advance care planning conversations, they must assess the patient's prognostic cognition and readiness for advance care planning. Considering the inaccurate prognostic awareness in a non-negligible proportion of patients and that astatic patients' preferences for future treatment and care are influenced by prognostic cognition, more research on decision-making support processes for high-quality and goal-concordant end-of-life care is needed along with research of advance care planning. In addition to making decisions regarding future medical treatment and care, oncologists must engage in continuous and dynamic goal-of-care conversations with empathic communication skills and compassion from diagnosis to end-of-life care.
Keywords: advance care planning; communication; end-of-life discussion; neoplasm; palliative care.
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
Figures

Similar articles
-
A qualitative analysis of responses to a question prompt list and prognosis and end-of-life care discussion prompts delivered in a communication support program.Psychooncology. 2015 Mar;24(3):287-93. doi: 10.1002/pon.3635. Epub 2014 Jul 30. Psychooncology. 2015. PMID: 25079976
-
Perceived Barriers to Goals of Care Discussions With Patients With Advanced Cancer and Their Families in the Ambulatory Setting: A Multicenter Survey of Oncologists.J Palliat Care. 2018 Jul;33(3):125-142. doi: 10.1177/0825859718762287. Epub 2018 Apr 2. J Palliat Care. 2018. PMID: 29607704
-
Shared decision-making in end-stage renal disease: a protocol for a multi-center study of a communication intervention to improve end-of-life care for dialysis patients.BMC Palliat Care. 2015 Jun 12;14:30. doi: 10.1186/s12904-015-0027-x. BMC Palliat Care. 2015. PMID: 26066323 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Communication in palliative care: talking about the end of life, before the end of life.Postgrad Med J. 2016 Aug;92(1090):466-70. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2015-133368. Epub 2016 May 6. Postgrad Med J. 2016. PMID: 27153866 Review.
-
Prognostication in brain tumors.Handb Clin Neurol. 2022;190:149-161. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-323-85029-2.00001-4. Handb Clin Neurol. 2022. PMID: 36055712 Review.
Cited by
-
Quality indicators for integrating oncology and home palliative care in Japan: modified Delphi study.Support Care Cancer. 2024 Jul 2;32(7):476. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08684-z. Support Care Cancer. 2024. PMID: 38954101
-
Personalized Care in Advance Care Planning with Cancer and Chronic Progressive Diseases Using the Go Wish Game.J Pers Med. 2025 Apr 30;15(5):180. doi: 10.3390/jpm15050180. J Pers Med. 2025. PMID: 40423052 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical