Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 9;17(1):58.
doi: 10.1186/s13071-024-06129-4.

Mixed-sex clusters on grass blades: breeding strategy of the ornate dog tick, Dermacentor reticulatus

Affiliations

Mixed-sex clusters on grass blades: breeding strategy of the ornate dog tick, Dermacentor reticulatus

Dagmara Wężyk et al. Parasit Vectors. .

Abstract

Background: The ornate dog tick Dermacentor reticulatus is second only to the hard tick Ixodes ricinus in terms of importance as a vector of infectious organisms, especially of Babesia canis, the agent of canine babesiosis. Both the geographical range and local densities of D. reticulatus are steadily increasing in many regions of Europe. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that D. reticulatus possesses an efficient breeding strategy that allows for a rapid increase in tick numbers and densities through the formation of mixed-sex clusters/aggregations while questing in the environment.

Methods: An observational study was carried out in the spring of 2023, at three sites in two regions in Central and North-Eastern Poland, both characterised by high tick densities. At each site, a 400-m-long transect was inspected for questing ticks. All noted ticks were collected, and tick numbers and sexes per stem were recorded. Differences in tick distribution by site and sex were analysed statistically.

Results: A total of 371 D. reticulatus (219 females, 152 males) ticks were collected from 270 grass stems over a combined 1200 m of transect. The majority of grass stems (74.4%) were occupied by just a single individual, with two-tick clusters the second most common category. The maximum number of D. reticulatus individuals observed on a single grass stem was six. Mixed-sex clusters were significantly more common than single-sex clusters at all three sites. With study sites combined, mixed-sex clusters accounted for 17.4% (95% confidence limit [95% CL] 13.9-21.6%) of observations, while for multiple males and multiple females, the values were 2.6% (95% CL: 1.4-4.7%) and 5.6% (95% CL: 3.7-8.3%), respectively.

Conclusions: Mixed-sex clusters of D. reticulatus ticks were significantly more common than single-sex clusters, which we hypothesise reflects an efficient, likely pheromone-mediated breeding strategy of this expansive tick species.

Keywords: Aggregations; Assembly; Behaviour; Dermacentor reticulatus; Mixed-sex clusters; Single-sex clusters; Ticks.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Anna Bajer is a Subject Editor for Parasites & Vectors.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Map of Poland showing tick sighting locations
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Clusters of adult questing Dermacentor reticulatus ticks on grass stems. a Two females, b 2 males, c 1 male and 2 females, d 1 female and 2 males, e, f 1 male and 1 female, g 4 males and 1 female, h 1 plant with 8 ticks on stems
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
a Frequency distribution of single and multiple D. reticulatus tick occupancy on grass stems. The percentages of grass stems with 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 5- and 6-tick occupancy were 74.4%, 17.4%, 5.9%, 1.1%, 0.7% and and 0.4%, respectively (see also Table 1). b Percentage of grass stems occupied by the various combinations of D. reticulatus ticks: single male (m), single female (f), multiple tick occupancy–only males (mm), multiple tick occupancy–only females (ff) and multiple tick occupancy–mixed sexes (mf). The number of records at each of the 3 collection sites for m, f, mm, ff and mf assemblages was 33, 42, 3, 5 and 17, respectively, at Kury; 29, 45, 4, 3 and 19, respectively, at Siekierki; and 16, 36, 0, 7 and 11, respectively, at Urwitałt. CI95, 95% Confidence interval

References

    1. Oliver JH. Tick reproduction: sperm development and cytogenetics. In: Obencha FA, Galun R, editors. Physiology of ticks. Current themes in tropical science, vol 8. New York/Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1982. p. 245–75.
    1. Kiszewski AE, Matuschka FR, Spielman A. Mating strategies and spermiogenesis in ixodid ticks. Ann Rev Entomol. 2001;46:167–182. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.46.1.167. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sonenshine DE. Pheromones and other semiochemicals of ticks and their use in tick control. Parasitology. 2004;129:405–425. doi: 10.1017/S003118200400486X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sonenshine D, Roe R. Ticks, people, and animals. In: Sonenshine DE, Roe RM, editors. Biology of ticks. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013.
    1. Vargová B, Pipová N, Baňas M, Majláth I, Tryjanowski P, Jankowiak Ł, et al. Behavioral repertoire on a vertical rod- an ethogram in Dermacentor reticulatus ticks. Life. 2022;12:2086. doi: 10.3390/life12122086. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources