Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 10;409(1):57.
doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03242-x.

Gallstone formation and subsequent cholecystectomy after oncological gastric and esophageal resection

Katharina Esswein  1 , Philipp Gehwolf  1 , Heinz Wykypiel  1 , Reinhold Kafka-Ritsch  2
Affiliations

Gallstone formation and subsequent cholecystectomy after oncological gastric and esophageal resection

Katharina Esswein et al. Langenbecks Arch Surg. .

Abstract

Purpose: Gallstone formation is increased after gastric (GR) or esophageal resection (ER); however, the exact pathophysiology is not fully understood yet. Symptomatic cholecystolithiasis and the need for subsequent cholecystectomy after upper gastrointestinal resection can alter the outcome in oncological patients. There is an ongoing discussion if these patients benefit from a simultaneous prophylactic cholecystectomy. This study aims to analyze the risk of gallstone formation after GR or ER and the perioperative course of a subsequent cholecystectomy.

Methods: In this study, all patients were included, who underwent an oncological gastric or esophageal resection at the Medical University of Innsbruck, Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery in the years 2003-2021.

Results: A simultaneous cholecystectomy was performed in 29.8% with GR and in 2.1% with ER (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in complications or length-of-stay between patients with simultaneous vs. no simultaneous cholecystectomy. Newly developed gallstones tended to be more common after GR (16% vs. 10% ER), after reconstruction without preservation of the duodenal passage (17% vs. 11% with) and after GR with lymph node dissection (19% vs. 5% without). After ER, subsequent cholecystectomy was significant less frequently (11.4% vs. 2.9% OR) (p = 0.005). The subsequent cholecystectomy was performed openly in 57.1% with major complications classified as Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3a in 14.3%.

Conclusion: Based on the findings of our study, we do not recommend simultaneous cholecystectomy routinely in oncological gastric or esophageal resections. An individualized approach depending on risk factors like extensive lymphadenectomy or duodenal passage can be discussed.

Keywords: Cancer; Cholecystectomy; Cholecystolithiasis; Prophylactic.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Gillen S, Michalski CW, Schuster T, Feith M, Friess H, Kleeff J (2010) Simultaneous/Incidental cholecystectomy during gastric/esophageal resection: systematic analysis of risks and benefits. World J Surg 34(5):1008–1014 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kobayashi T, Hisanaga M, Kanehiro H, Yamada Y, Ko S, Nakajima Y (2005) Analysis of risk factors for the development of gallstones after gastrectomy. Br J Surg 92(11):1399–1403 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lai SL, Yang JC, Wu JM, Lai IR, Chen CN, Lin MT et al (2013) Combined cholecystectomy in gastric cancer surgery. Int J Surg 11(4):305–308 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tsunoda K, Shirai Y, Wakai T, Yokoyama N, Akazawa K, Hatakeyama K (2004) Increased risk of cholelithiasis after esophagectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 11(5):319–323 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yi SQ, Ohta T, Tsuchida A, Terayama H, Naito M, Li J et al (2007) Surgical anatomy of innervation of the gallbladder in humans and Suncus murinus with special reference to morphological understanding of gallstone formation after gastrectomy. World J Gastroenterol 13(14):2066–2071 - DOI - PubMed - PMC

LinkOut - more resources