Cesarean Uterine Lacerations and Prematurity in the Following Delivery: A Retrospective Longitudinal Follow-Up Cohort Study
- PMID: 38337443
- PMCID: PMC10856371
- DOI: 10.3390/jcm13030749
Cesarean Uterine Lacerations and Prematurity in the Following Delivery: A Retrospective Longitudinal Follow-Up Cohort Study
Abstract
(1) Background: We aimed to investigate whether second-stage cesarean delivery (SSCD) had a higher occurrence of low-segment uterine incision extensions compared with cesarean delivery (CD) at other stages of labor and to study the association of these extensions with preterm birth (PTB). (2) Methods: In this retrospective longitudinal follow-up cohort study, spanning from 2006 to 2019, all selected mothers who delivered by CD at first birth (P1) and returned for second birth (P2) were grouped by cesarean stage at P1: planned CD, first-stage CD, or SSCD. Mothers with a PTB at P1, multiple-gestation pregnancies in either P1 or P2 and those with prior abortions were excluded. (3) Results: The study included 1574 selected women who underwent a planned CD at P1 (n = 483 (30.7%)), first-stage CD (n = 878 (55.8%), and SSCD (n = 213 (13.5%)). There was a higher occurrence of low-segment uterine incision extensions among SSCD patients compared to first-stage CDs and planned CDs: 50/213 (23%), 56/878 (6.4%), and 5/483 (1%), respectively (p < 0.001). A multivariate logistic regression showed that women undergoing an SSCD are at risk for low-segment uterine incision extensions compared with women undergoing a planned CD, OR 28.8 (CI 11.2; 74.4). We observed no association between the occurrence of a low-segment uterine incisional extension at P1 and PTB ≤ 37 gestational weeks in the subsequent delivery, with rates of 6.3% (7/111) for those with an extension compared to 4.5% (67/1463) for those without an extension (p = 0.41). Notably, parturients experiencing a low-segment uterine incisional extension during their first childbirth were six times more likely to have a preterm delivery before 32 weeks of gestation compared to those without extensions, with two cases (1.8%) compared to four cases (0.3%), respectively. A similar trend was observed for preterm deliveries between 32 and 34 weeks of gestation, with those having extensions showing twice the prevalence of prematurity compared to those without, with a p-value of 0.047. (4) Conclusions: This study highlights that mothers undergoing SSCD experience higher prevalence of low uterine incision extensions compared to other CDs. To further ascertain whether the presence of these extensions is associated with preterm birth (PTB) in subsequent births, particularly early PTB before 34 weeks of gestation, larger-scale future studies are warranted.
Keywords: lower uterine incision extensions; preterm birth; second-stage cesarean delivery.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Impacted fetal head extraction methods at second stage cesarean and subsequent preterm delivery: A multicenter study.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024 Aug;166(2):775-782. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15383. Epub 2024 Jan 18. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024. PMID: 38235842
-
The association between unintended hysterotomy extensions with cesarean delivery and subsequent preterm birth.Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2024 Apr;6(4):101326. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101326. Epub 2024 Mar 5. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2024. PMID: 38447679
-
Risk factors for uterine incision extension during cesarean delivery.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Jun;35(11):2156-2161. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1783230. Epub 2020 Jun 24. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022. PMID: 32580653
-
Risk of stillbirth, preterm delivery, and fetal growth restriction following exposure in a previous birth: systematic review and meta-analysis.BJOG. 2018 Jan;125(2):183-192. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14906. Epub 2017 Oct 3. BJOG. 2018. PMID: 28856792
-
Delivery for women with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Sep;170(1):25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.05.015. Epub 2013 Jun 28. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013. PMID: 23810846 Review.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources