Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 28;13(3):749.
doi: 10.3390/jcm13030749.

Cesarean Uterine Lacerations and Prematurity in the Following Delivery: A Retrospective Longitudinal Follow-Up Cohort Study

Affiliations

Cesarean Uterine Lacerations and Prematurity in the Following Delivery: A Retrospective Longitudinal Follow-Up Cohort Study

Orna Reichman et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

(1) Background: We aimed to investigate whether second-stage cesarean delivery (SSCD) had a higher occurrence of low-segment uterine incision extensions compared with cesarean delivery (CD) at other stages of labor and to study the association of these extensions with preterm birth (PTB). (2) Methods: In this retrospective longitudinal follow-up cohort study, spanning from 2006 to 2019, all selected mothers who delivered by CD at first birth (P1) and returned for second birth (P2) were grouped by cesarean stage at P1: planned CD, first-stage CD, or SSCD. Mothers with a PTB at P1, multiple-gestation pregnancies in either P1 or P2 and those with prior abortions were excluded. (3) Results: The study included 1574 selected women who underwent a planned CD at P1 (n = 483 (30.7%)), first-stage CD (n = 878 (55.8%), and SSCD (n = 213 (13.5%)). There was a higher occurrence of low-segment uterine incision extensions among SSCD patients compared to first-stage CDs and planned CDs: 50/213 (23%), 56/878 (6.4%), and 5/483 (1%), respectively (p < 0.001). A multivariate logistic regression showed that women undergoing an SSCD are at risk for low-segment uterine incision extensions compared with women undergoing a planned CD, OR 28.8 (CI 11.2; 74.4). We observed no association between the occurrence of a low-segment uterine incisional extension at P1 and PTB ≤ 37 gestational weeks in the subsequent delivery, with rates of 6.3% (7/111) for those with an extension compared to 4.5% (67/1463) for those without an extension (p = 0.41). Notably, parturients experiencing a low-segment uterine incisional extension during their first childbirth were six times more likely to have a preterm delivery before 32 weeks of gestation compared to those without extensions, with two cases (1.8%) compared to four cases (0.3%), respectively. A similar trend was observed for preterm deliveries between 32 and 34 weeks of gestation, with those having extensions showing twice the prevalence of prematurity compared to those without, with a p-value of 0.047. (4) Conclusions: This study highlights that mothers undergoing SSCD experience higher prevalence of low uterine incision extensions compared to other CDs. To further ascertain whether the presence of these extensions is associated with preterm birth (PTB) in subsequent births, particularly early PTB before 34 weeks of gestation, larger-scale future studies are warranted.

Keywords: lower uterine incision extensions; preterm birth; second-stage cesarean delivery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of study population.

Similar articles

References

    1. Goldenberg R.L., Culhane J.F., Iams J.D., Romero R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet. 2008;371:75–84. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60074-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Romero R., Espinoza J., Kusanovic J.P., Gotsch F., Hassan S., Erez O., Chaiworapongsa T., Mazor M. The preterm parturition syndrome. BJOG. 2006;113((Suppl. S3)):17–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01120.x. Erratum in BJOG 2008, 115, 674–675. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wood S.L., Tang S., Crawford S. Cesarean Delivery in the Second Stage of Labor and the Risk of Subsequent Premature Birth. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2017;217:63.e1–63.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.03.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Levine L.D., Sammel M.D., Hirshberg A., Elovitz M.A., Srinivas S.K. Does stage of labor at time of cesarean delivery affect risk of subsequent preterm birth? Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015;212:360.e1–360.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.09.035. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Watson H.A., Carter J., David A.L., Seed P.T., Shennan A.H. Full dilation cesarean section: A risk factor for recurrent second-trimester loss and preterm birth. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2017;96:1100–1105. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13160. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources