Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jun 3;31(4):taae024.
doi: 10.1093/jtm/taae024.

Integrating sexual and reproductive health into pre-travel consultations

Carlos Santaolaya  1 , Juhi Malhotra  1 , James A Fowler  1 , Sarah Warzywoda  1 , Joe Debattista  2 , Deborah J Mills  3 , Colleen Lau  1   4 , Luis Furuya-Kanamori  1   4 , Jo Durham  5 , Amy B Mullens  6 , Satrio N Istiko  1 , Judith A Dean  1   7
Affiliations
Review

Integrating sexual and reproductive health into pre-travel consultations

Carlos Santaolaya et al. J Travel Med. .

Abstract

Background: Casual sex during travel is a major preventable factor in the global transmission of sexually transmissible infections (STI). Pre-travel consults present an excellent opportunity for practitioners to educate travellers about sexual and reproductive health (SRH) and safety. This scoping review aims to explore and understand the extent to which SRH is included in pre-travel consultations.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus, Medline and Web of Science were systematically searched for primary research articles exploring whether health care practitioners (HCP) included SRH in pre-travel consultations. Extracted findings were synthesized and presented in narrative form.

Results: Findings across 13 articles suggest HCPs infrequently broached SRH in pre-travel consultations with HCP discomfort, and lack of time and resources presented as key barriers. Urban practice settings, HCP experience, training in travel medicine and traveller characteristics such as sexual orientation were positively associated with discussions about SRH. SRH advice reported was general in nature, primarily focusing on safer sex, condoms or unspecified STI advice. Risk assessments based solely on age or stereotypes around sexual preferences led to key aspects of SRH care being missed for some (e.g. SRH was less likely to be discussed with older travellers).

Conclusions: HCPs frequently miss opportunities to integrate SRH into pre-travel consultations. Strategies to promote HCP confidence and awareness present a promising means to boost the frequency and quality of SRH advice disseminated. Integrating culturally safe and responsive SRH history-taking and advice into pre-travel consultations may contribute to global reductions in STI transmission and promote traveller SRH well-being.

Keywords: Travel; provider; reproductive health; review; sexual health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview of the study selection process
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Deane KD, Parkhurst JO, Johnston D. Linking migration, mobility and HIV. Trop Med Int Health 2010; 15:1458–63. - PubMed
    1. Ward BJ, Plourde P. Travel and sexually transmitted infections. J Travel Med 2006; 13:300–17. - PubMed
    1. Rogstad KE. Sexually transmitted infections and travel. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2019; 32:56–62. - PubMed
    1. Steffen R, deBernardis C, Baños A. Travel epidemiology--a global perspective. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2003; 21:89–95. - PubMed
    1. National Academies of Sciences E, Medicine, Health. et al. Washington (DC). In: Crowley JS, Geller AB, Vermund SH (eds). Sexually Transmitted Infections: Adopting a Sexual Health Paradigm. National Academies Press (US)Copyright 2021 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved, 2021. - PubMed

Publication types