Estimating the SF-6Dv1 Value Set for a Population-Based Sample in Lebanon
- PMID: 38340672
- DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2023.12.008
Estimating the SF-6Dv1 Value Set for a Population-Based Sample in Lebanon
Abstract
Objectives: The SF-6Dv1 is a preference-based measure derived from the SF-36 for use in quality-adjusted life-year estimation for cost-utility analysis. Country-specific value sets for SF-6Dv1 are needed to reflect societal preferences but none are available for Lebanon and other Arabic countries. This study aimed to generate a value set for SF-6Dv1 for Lebanon and to compare results with the UK set.
Methods: A sample of 249 health states defined by the SF-6Dv1 were valued by a representative sample of 577 members of the Lebanon general population, using standard gamble. Several multivariate regression models at mean and individual level were fitted to estimate utilities for all SF-6Dv1 states with selection of best fitting models based on predictive ability, consistency, and model fit. The best fitting models were compared with those fitted in the UK study.
Results: Data from 553 eligible respondents providing 3308 valuations were used for the analysis. Lebanese values were consistently higher than UK values, indicating differences in preferences, and there were no negative values. The random effects model using only main effects was the best performing model. There were inconsistencies in 2 dimensions, thereby consistent models were estimated with values ranging from 0.367 to 1. The results are consistent with the UK results.
Conclusions: This study provides the first population-based value set for SF-6Dv1 health states for Lebanon, making it possible to generate quality-adjusted life-years for cost-utility analysis studies. The potential for applications of a standardized utility measure is enormous both in Lebanon and all Arab countries.
Keywords: Lebanon; SF-6Dv1; modeling stated preference data; preference-based health measure; weighting system.
Copyright © 2024 International Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Author Disclosures Author disclosure forms can be accessed below in the Supplemental Material section.
Similar articles
-
The Short Form 6 Dimensions (SF-6D): Development and Evolution.Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 Jan;23(1):19-33. doi: 10.1007/s40258-024-00919-8. Epub 2024 Oct 26. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025. PMID: 39460886 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Estimating the SF-6D value set for a population-based sample of Brazilians.Value Health. 2011 Jul-Aug;14(5 Suppl 1):S108-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.05.012. Value Health. 2011. PMID: 21839880
-
Examining the Feasibility and Acceptability of Valuing the Arabic Version of SF-6D in a Lebanese Population.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 6;17(3):1037. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17031037. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32041284 Free PMC article.
-
Should the Preference-Based Index Set of Values Be Country or Disease Specific? An Analysis Using Data From Women With Symptoms of Overactive Bladder.Value Health Reg Issues. 2023 Nov;38:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2023.05.007. Epub 2023 Jul 4. Value Health Reg Issues. 2023. PMID: 37413769
-
A Portuguese value set for the SF-6D.Value Health. 2010 Aug;13(5):624-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2010.00701.x. Epub 2010 Mar 10. Value Health. 2010. PMID: 20230545
Cited by
-
The Short Form 6 Dimensions (SF-6D): Development and Evolution.Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 Jan;23(1):19-33. doi: 10.1007/s40258-024-00919-8. Epub 2024 Oct 26. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025. PMID: 39460886 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources