Psychedelic Microdosing among Young Adults from Southern California
- PMID: 38341607
- PMCID: PMC11315810
- DOI: 10.1080/02791072.2024.2313684
Psychedelic Microdosing among Young Adults from Southern California
Abstract
Despite common depictions in the media, there is little scientific evidence on microdosing psychedelic drugs. We assessed awareness, prevalence, and dosing practices of microdosing psychedelic drugs among young adults 18-22 years old from Southern California (2018-2019). We examined whether sociodemographic factors, personality traits, mental health, or other substance use behaviors were correlated with having ever microdosed. Among 2,396 participants, 293 (12%) had heard of microdosing and 74 (3%) ever microdosed. Among those who had heard of microdosing, 79% correctly defined microdosing as taking an amount of a psychedelic much lower than a standard dose, whereas 15% misperceived microdosing as a standard psychedelic dose. Psilocybin was the most common drug ever microdosed (70%), followed by lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD, 57%). Among those who ever microdosed, ~18% reported using psychoactive doses far higher than would be generally considered a microdose. White race, male/masculine gender identity, bisexual identity, past 6-month other drug use, greater attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms, mindfulness, and sensation-seeking were positively associated with having ever microdosed in multivariable models. Young adult microdosing merits further attention from scientific and public health professionals to help prevent misperceptions and potential adverse consequences as well as explore its potential therapeutic applications.
Keywords: LSD; MDMA; microdosing; psilocybin; psychedelics; young adults.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Interest
PSH was previously in paid advisory relationships with Reset Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Silo Pharma and is currently in paid advisory relationships with the following organizations regarding the development of psychedelics and related compounds: Bright Minds Biosciences Ltd., Eleusis Benefit Corporation, and Journey Colab Corporation.
Similar articles
-
Microdosing psychedelics: Motivations, subjective effects and harm reduction.Int J Drug Policy. 2020 Jan;75:102600. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.11.008. Epub 2019 Nov 25. Int J Drug Policy. 2020. PMID: 31778967
-
Microdosing psychedelics: Demographics, practices, and psychiatric comorbidities.J Psychopharmacol. 2020 Jun;34(6):612-622. doi: 10.1177/0269881120908004. Epub 2020 Feb 28. J Psychopharmacol. 2020. PMID: 32108529
-
Microdosing psychedelics: Subjective benefits and challenges, substance testing behavior, and the relevance of intention.J Psychopharmacol. 2022 Jan;36(1):85-96. doi: 10.1177/0269881120953994. Epub 2020 Oct 8. J Psychopharmacol. 2022. PMID: 33591231
-
Is microdosing a placebo? A rapid review of low-dose LSD and psilocybin research.J Psychopharmacol. 2024 Aug;38(8):701-711. doi: 10.1177/02698811241254831. Epub 2024 Jun 14. J Psychopharmacol. 2024. PMID: 38877715 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Microdosing psychedelics: More questions than answers? An overview and suggestions for future research.J Psychopharmacol. 2019 Sep;33(9):1039-1057. doi: 10.1177/0269881119857204. Epub 2019 Jul 14. J Psychopharmacol. 2019. PMID: 31303095 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Bachman JG, Wadsworth KN, O’Malley PM, Johnston LD, & Schulenberg JE (1996). Smoking, Drinking, and Drug Use in Young Adulthood: The Impacts of New Freedoms and New Responsibilities. Psychology Press. 10.4324/9780203763797 - DOI
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous