Clinical Effect of Tumor-Specific Total Nutrients in Patients with Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Radical Gastric Cancer Resection: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- PMID: 38342837
- PMCID: PMC11186903
- DOI: 10.1007/s12029-024-01029-3
Clinical Effect of Tumor-Specific Total Nutrients in Patients with Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Radical Gastric Cancer Resection: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
Background: In this study, we combined adjuvant chemotherapy after radical gastric cancer resection with tumor-specific total nutrient therapy to analyze how it affects the nutritional state and immune function of the patient.
Method: We collected data from 106 patients having undergone adjuvant chemotherapy after radical gastric cancer resection between January 2020 and December 2021. We divided the patients into experimental and control groups (with 53 cases in each group) through single-blinded simple randomization using a random number table and the sealed envelope system. The control group received chemotherapy and the regular nutritional diet at the same time while the experimental group received tumor-specific total nutrients based on the control group. We analyzed the index results for the physical examination, nutritional status, and immune function of the patients in both groups recorded before and after one chemotherapeutic cycle.
Results: The control and experimental group compositions were as follows: 58.5% and 52.8% males with a mean age ± standard deviation of 54.36 ± 12.68 and 55.15 ± 12.32 years, respectively. After one chemotherapeutic cycle and the nutritional intervention, the experimental group displayed better physical examination indicators than the control group concerning the weight (55.8 ± 5.41 vs. 54.8 ± 6.94, p = 0.621), body fat mass (13.3 ± 0.88 vs. 13.1 ± 0.91, p = 0.253), upper arm circumference (21.9 ± 0.94 vs. 21.2 ± 1.23 cm, p = 0.001), triceps skinfold thickness (15.1 ± 1.36 vs. 14.3 ± 1.62 cm, p = 0.007), and grip strength (23.0 ± 1.30 vs. 22.3 ± 1.33, p = 0.007). In addition, the experimental group yielded better nutritional-status indicators than the control, including albumin (35.2 ± 1.60 vs. 33.7 ± 1.44 g/L, p = 0.001), hemoglobin (115.7 ± 9.28 vs. 111.5 ± 10.56 g/L, p = 0.032), total protein (63.7 ± 5.85 vs. 60.5 ± 5.27 g/L, p = 0.004), transferrin (2.5 ± 0.53 vs. 2.2 ± 0.58 g/L, p = 0.007), and immune-function indicators CD4+ (32.8 ± 4.82 vs. 28.8 ± 3.76, p = 0.001), CD8+ (34.1 ± 3.36 vs. 37.2 ± 3.85, p = 0.001), CD4/CD8 (1.0 ± 0.28 vs. 0.8 ± 0.34, p = 0.001), IgA (2.7 ± 1.43 vs. 4.1 ± 1.47, p = 0.001), and IgG (8.8 ± 1.74 vs. 10.9 ± 1.28, p = 0.001).
Conclusion: Combined tumor-specific total nutrient and adjuvant chemotherapy application after radical gastric cancer surgery effectively improves the nutritional state and immune function of the patients and could be applied in clinical practice.
Keywords: Enteral nutrition; Gastric cancer; Immunity; Postoperative chemotherapy; Tumor-specific total nutrients.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Adjuvant albumin-bound paclitaxel combined with S-1 vs. oxaliplatin combined with capecitabine after D2 gastrectomy in patients with stage III gastric adenocarcinoma: a phase III multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled clinical trial protocol.BMC Cancer. 2021 Jan 12;21(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07772-7. BMC Cancer. 2021. PMID: 33435909 Free PMC article.
-
[Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on nutritional status of locally advanced gastric cancer].Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Mar 25;21(3):331-335. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018. PMID: 29577223 Chinese.
-
[Safety and efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy with oxaliplatin and S-1 for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer after D2 lymph nodes dissection].Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Feb 25;24(2):145-152. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20201016-00561. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021. PMID: 33508920 Chinese.
-
[Safety and effectiveness of oxaliplatin combined with capecitabine or oxaliplatin combined with S-1 neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer].Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Feb 25;24(2):138-144. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20200721-00433. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021. PMID: 33508919 Chinese.
-
Comparison of S-1-based vs. capecitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Dec;77(12):1791-1804. doi: 10.1007/s00228-021-03187-w. Epub 2021 Jul 17. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2021. PMID: 34275019
Cited by
-
Prognosis and Treatment of Gastric Cancer: A 2024 Update.Cancers (Basel). 2024 Apr 27;16(9):1708. doi: 10.3390/cancers16091708. Cancers (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38730659 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- HUANG XY, HAN RQ, TENG ZM, et al. The analysis of incidence and death of gastric cancer and rural survival in Jiangsu province from 2003 to 2012. Chinese disease control.2017,21(5):482-486.
-
- Aoyama T, Nishikawa K, Fujitani K, et al. Early results of a randomized two-by-two factorial phase II trial comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy with two and four courses of cisplatin/S-1 and docetaxel/cisplatin/S-1 as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(8):1876–81. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx236. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous