Understanding clerkship experiences in emergency medicine and their potential influence on specialty selection: A qualitative study
- PMID: 38343629
- PMCID: PMC10858322
- DOI: 10.1002/aet2.10932
Understanding clerkship experiences in emergency medicine and their potential influence on specialty selection: A qualitative study
Abstract
Objectives: The specialty of emergency medicine (EM) is experiencing a significant decrease in student interest. In addition, women are historically underrepresented within the specialty at all levels of training and practice. We sought to understand how clinical experiences and perceptions of EM influence specialty selection by medical students, particularly women.
Methods: Using a constructivist grounded theory approach, we analyzed semistructured interviews with senior medical students who considered EM as a specialty. We used purposive sampling to recruit from diverse learning environments and represent a variety of experiences. Participants reflected on their specialty selection process and experiences in EM including their perceived acceptance in the work environment.
Results: Twenty-five medical students from 11 geographically diverse schools participated. A total of 68% (17/25) identified as women. The majority (21/25, 84%) planned on applying to EM residency. We identified four major themes: (1) distressing interpersonal interactions with patients and the ED care team negatively affect students; (2) EM culture includes behaviors that are perceived as exclusionary; (3) beliefs about the attributes of an ideal EM physician and the specialty itself have a gendered nature; and (4) ease of access to mentors, representation, and early exposure to EM environment increased interest in specialty.
Conclusions: Our participants express that EM causes challenges for students to accept the norms of behavior in the field, which is an essential element in joining a group and professional identity formation. In addition, we raise concern that gendered perceptions and language may send exclusionary environmental cues that may negatively impact recruitment of a diverse physician workforce.
© 2023 The Authors. AEM Education and Training published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.
Conflict of interest statement
Dr. Klekowski currently serves as a Director‐at‐Large for the SCUF Board of Directors; this work is not related. Dr. Klekowski has a former consulting relationship for 4Catalyzer Corporation; this work is not related. Dr. Hopson is a member‐at‐large of the CORD board of directors; this work is independent of that role and does not reflect organizational opinions or input. Dr. Hopson has also received contract research funding from Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, which is unrelated to this work and ended in August 2022. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- National Residency Matching Program . Results and Data: 2016 Main Residency Match®. National Resident Matching Program; 2016.
-
- National Residency Matching Program . Advance Data Tables: 2018 Main Residency Match®. National Resident Matching Program; 2018.
-
- National Residency Matching Program . Advance Data Tables: 2023: Main Residency Match®. National Resident Matching Program; 2023.
-
- Marco CA, Courtney DM, Ling LJ, et al. The emergency medicine physician workforce: projections for 2030. Ann Emerg Med. 2021;78(6):726‐737. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources