Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jan 26:15:1343687.
doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1343687. eCollection 2024.

Associations between MTHFR gene polymorphisms (C677T and A1298C) and genetic susceptibility to prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Review

Associations between MTHFR gene polymorphisms (C677T and A1298C) and genetic susceptibility to prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Jianan You et al. Front Genet. .

Abstract

Background: The association between MTHFR gene polymorphisms (C677T and A1298C) and prostate cancer risk remains controversial. Methods: Two independent researchers searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and Web of Science databases for all papers published up to 12/19/2023 and used various genetic models to evaluate the relationship between MTHFR polymorphisms and prostate cancer risk. Results: The meta-analysis included 26 case‒control studies with a total of 12,455 cases and 13,900 controls with the C677T polymorphism and 6,396 cases and 8,913 controls with the A1298C polymorphism. Overall, no significant association was found between the MTHFR gene polymorphisms and prostate cancer risk. However, the C677T polymorphism was associated with reduced prostate cancer risk in the Asian population (T allele vs. C allele: OR = 0.759, 95% CI 0.669-0.861, p < 0.001; TT + CT vs. CC: OR = 0.720, 95% CI 0.638-0.812, p < 0.001; TT vs. CC + CT: OR = 0.719, 95% CI 0.617-0.838, p < 0.001; TT vs. CC: OR = 0.620, 95% CI 0.522-0.737, p < 0.001); however, the A1298C polymorphism was associated with an increased risk in the mixed race group from the United States (CC + AC vs. AA: OR = 1.464, 95% CI 1.052-2.037, p = 0.024; AC vs. AA: OR = 1.615, 95% CI 1.037-2.514, p = 0.034). Conclusion: The meta-analysis suggested that MTHFR gene polymorphisms (C677T and A1298C) may have different effects on prostate cancer risk in specific populations.

Keywords: A1298C; C677T; MTHFR; genetic polymorphism; prostate cancer; rs1801131; rs1801133.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flow chart of meta-analysis to identify associations between MTHFR gene polymorphisms (C677T, A1298C) and prostate cancer risk.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
(A) Forest plot of the association between MTHFR gene C677T polymorphism and PCa risk under Allelic model. (B) Forest plot of the association between MTHFR gene C677T polymorphism and PCa risk under Dominant model. (C) Forest plot of the association between MTHFR gene C677T polymorphism and PCa risk under recessive model. (D) Forest plot of the association between MTHFR gene C677T polymorphism and PCa risk under over-dominant model. (E) Forest plot of the association between MTHFR gene C677T polymorphism and PCa risk under additive model.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
(A) Forest plot of the association between MTHFR gene A1298C polymorphism and PCa risk under allelic model. (B) Forest plot of the association between MTHFR gene A1298C polymorphism and PCa risk under dominant model. (C) Forest plot of the association between MTHFR gene A1298C polymorphism and PCa risk under recessive model. (D) Forest plot of the association between MTHFR gene A1298C polymorphism and PCa risk under over-dominant model. (E) Forest plot of the association between MTHFR gene A1298C polymorphism and PCa risk under additive model.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cai D., Ning L., Pan C., Liu X., Bu R., Chen X., et al. (2010). Association of polymorphisms in folate metabolic genes and prostate cancer risk: a case-control study in a Chinese population. J. Genet. 89 (2), 263–267. eng. Epub 2010/09/24. Cited in: Pubmed; PMID 20861582. 10.1007/s12041-010-0037-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chang Y., Phillips M. R., Guymer R. H., Thabane L., Bhandari M., Chaudhary V., et al. (2022). The 5 min meta-analysis: understanding how to read and interpret a forest plot. Eye (Lond) 36 (4), 673–675. eng. Epub 2022/01/05.Cited in:Pubmed;PMID 34987196. 10.1038/s41433-021-01867-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen P. L., Li W. T., Wang J., Jiang Y. D., Wu P., Chen T., et al. (2015). Association between MTHFR gene polymorphisms (C677T, A1298C) and genetic susceptibility to prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. GMR 14 (4), 19191–19202. eng. Epub 2016/01/20. Cited in: Pubmed; PMID 26782572. 10.4238/2015.December.29.29 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen W. Q., Li H., Sun K. X., Zheng R. S., Zhang S. W., Zeng H. M., et al. (2018). Report of cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2014. Zhonghua zhong liu za zhi Chin. J. Oncol. 40 (1), 5–13. chi. Epub 2018/01/25. Cited in: Pubmed; PMID 29365411. 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2018.01.002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Choi S.-W., Friso S. (2006). Interaction between folate and methylene-tetrahydrofolate reductase gene in cancer. Nutrient-gene Interact. cancer, 57–74. 10.1201/9781420004847-4 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources