Cardiac Remote Monitoring Devices and Technologies: A Review for the Perioperative Physician and Telemedicine Providers
- PMID: 38343706
- PMCID: PMC10855008
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.53914
Cardiac Remote Monitoring Devices and Technologies: A Review for the Perioperative Physician and Telemedicine Providers
Abstract
Cardiovascular complications are a major cause of morbidity and mortality after surgery, necessitating adequate and thorough preoperative risk stratification and screening. Several technological advances in cardiac remote monitoring have improved the assessment and diagnosis of cardiovascular disease in patients before and after surgery. These devices perform measurements of physiological function, including vital signs, and more advanced functions, such as electrocardiograms and heart sound recordings. Some of the currently available devices include Fitbit® (Google LLC, Mountain View, CA, USA), BodyGuardian® (Preventive Inc., Rochester, MN, USA), ZephyrTM Performance Systems (Zephyr Inc., Annapolis, MD, USA), Sensium® (The Surgical Company, Amersfoort, UT, The Netherlands), KardiaMobile® (AliveCor, Mountain View, CA, USA), Coala® Heart Monitor (Coala Life Inc., Uppsala, Sweden), Smartex® Wearable Wellness System (Smartex, Porto, LX, Portugal), Eko® CORE and DUO (Eko Health, Emeryville, CA, USA), and TytoCareTM (TytoCare Ltd., New York, USA). Early studies have applied these devices to asymptomatic individuals and those with known cardiovascular disease with good sensitivity and specificity for electrophysiologic diagnosis. These devices carry several technical and other limitations, somewhat restricting the generalization of their use to all patients. However, information gathered from these devices can further guide anesthetic technique, operative timing, and postoperative follow-up, among other variables. As telehealth becomes more prevalent and comprehensive, it is paramount for the perioperative physician to be familiar with the available cardiac remote monitoring technologies.
Keywords: cardiac remote monitoring devices; remote cardiac monitoring; remote patient monitoring; remote patient monitoring devices; remote patient monitoring in preoperative assessment; telehealth; telehealth for the perioperative area; telemedicine in pre-anesthesia testing.
Copyright © 2024, Kotha et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
References
-
- Cardiovascular complications after non-cardiac surgery. Sellers D, Srinivas C, Djaiani G. Anaesthesia. 2018;73:34–42. - PubMed
-
- Perioperative cardiovascular risk assessment and management for noncardiac surgery: a review. Smilowitz NR, Berger JS. JAMA. 2020;324:279–290. - PubMed
-
- Preoperative cardiac risk assessment. Raslau D, Bierle DM, Stephenson CR, Mikhail MA, Kebede EB, Mauck KF. Mayo Clin Proc. 2020;95:1064–1079. - PubMed
-
- 2014 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Fleisher LA, Fleischmann KE, Auerbach AD, et al. Circulation. 2014;130:0. - PubMed
-
- Real-world estimate of the value of one metabolic equivalent in a population of patients planning major surgery. Douglas N, Andrews G, Altamimi H, Wang A, Basto J, Smith RE, Taylor HE. Intern Med J. 2022;52:1409–1414. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials