Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 5:17:533-540.
doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S444053. eCollection 2024.

Coping Profiles and Differences in Psychological Distress and Quality of Life in Clients Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Techniques: A Latent Profile Analysis

Jie Bai  1 , Jinxia Zheng  1 , Nafei Guo  2 , Yueyan Dong  1 , Ke Wang  1 , Cheng Cheng  3 , Hui Jiang  2 , Lin Qian  4
Affiliations

Coping Profiles and Differences in Psychological Distress and Quality of Life in Clients Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Techniques: A Latent Profile Analysis

Jie Bai et al. J Multidiscip Healthc. .

Abstract

Purpose: Receiving assisted reproductive technology is stressful due to its long-lasting process, which might pose negative impacts on clients' psychological well-being and quality of life. This study was to investigate coping profiles among couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology and examine their associations with psychological distress and quality of life.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at the IVF center of a specialized hospital in Shanghai, China. Of 502 eligible clients completed a structured, online survey of socio-demographic information, Dyadic Coping Inventory, Kessler Psychological Stress Scale, and Fertility quality of life. Coping profiles were identified using latent profile analysis and differences between identified profiles on psychological distress and quality of life were examined using analyses of covariance.

Results: A three-profile solution was supported: low dyadic coping group (n = 168, 33.50%), moderate dyadic coping group (n = 241, 48.00%), and high dyadic coping group (n = 93, 18.50%). Significant differences between those groups were found in psychological distress and quality of life.

Conclusion: The findings of this study have revealed dyadic coping profiles in clients undergoing assisted reproductive technology, which are differentially associated with psychological distress and quality of life.

Keywords: assisted reproductive technology; coping; latent profile analysis; psychological distress; quality of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. World Health Organization. Infertility. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/infertility. Accessed December 27, 2023.
    1. Sharlip ID, Jarow JP, Belker AM, et al. Best practice policies for male infertility. Fertil Steril. 2002;77(5):873–882. doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(02)03105-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion DoRH. What is assisted reproductive technology? Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/art/whatis.html. Accessed July 9, 2023.
    1. Clifton J, Domar AD. Chapter 10 - Psychological distress and infertility: prevalence, impact, and interventions. In: Vaamonde D, Hackney AC, Garcia-Manso JM, editors. Fertility, Pregnancy, and Wellness. Elsevier; 2022:163–181.
    1. Taebi M, Kariman N, Montazeri A, Majd HA. Infertility stigma: a qualitative study on feelings and experiences of infertile women. Int J Fertil Steril. 2021;15(3):189. - PMC - PubMed