Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 10;16(1):e51988.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.51988. eCollection 2024 Jan.

Public Awareness of Triage Systems and Waiting Times During Emergency Department Visits in the Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia

Affiliations

Public Awareness of Triage Systems and Waiting Times During Emergency Department Visits in the Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia

Salahulddin Abuljadail et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Introduction: The effective functioning of emergency departments (EDs) is essential for providing timely and appropriate medical care to patients with acute health issues. Triage, a critical aspect of ED operations, involves prioritizing patients based on the severity of their conditions. However, patients' understanding of the triage system plays a significant role in ensuring its efficient utilization. This study aims to examine the community's understanding of the triage system and the influencing factors.

Methodology: A cross-sectional study included 775 participants from the Eastern region of Saudi Arabia, all of whom had prior visits to the ED during their lifetime. The data was randomly collected between June and July 2023 through a self-administered online questionnaire.

Results: The results showed that a substantial number of participants (73.8%) were aware of why some patients are prioritized over others in terms of room allocation, while 26.2% lacked this awareness. Among those aware, the majority (80.5%) believed that the priority system is fair, while 19.5% disagreed. Roughly two-thirds (64.8%) of the participants understood the concept of triage, while 35.2% lacked knowledge in this regard. The history of ED visits, age, and highest level of education were significantly associated with knowledge (p < 0.001). Participants who had a history of ED visits, were aged 20-29 years, and had a bachelor's degree had the highest percentage of adequate knowledge. The study also found that the most common reasons for non-urgent visits to the ED were the unavailability of appointments elsewhere (35%) and the perception that the ED provides faster care (30.4%).

Conclusion: The study's assessment of triage knowledge reveals a moderate understanding among participants, with a majority demonstrating awareness of the prioritization system. The associations identified between demographic factors and triage knowledge highlight the importance of tailoring educational initiatives to specific groups. Individuals who visited the ED frequently and those who sought prior care exhibited better triage knowledge, suggesting potential opportunities for targeted interventions.

Keywords: ed utilization; emergency department; triage knowledge; triage system; waiting times.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Distribution of knowledge scores with levels of education
Figure 2
Figure 2. Causes of going to emergency directly without going to a health center
ED: emergency department
Figure 3
Figure 3. Reasons for selecting a specific emergency department
ED: emergency department

References

    1. Reasons for non-urgent presentations to the emergency department in Saudi Arabia. Alyasin A, Douglas C. Int Emerg Nurs. 2014;22:220–225. - PubMed
    1. Evolution of triage systems. Robertson-Steel I. Emerg Med J. 2006;23:154–155. - PMC - PubMed
    1. The Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale: Education Manual Module. 2012. https://caep.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/module_1_slides_v2.5_2012.pdf https://caep.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/module_1_slides_v2.5_2012.pdf
    1. Beveridge R, Clarke BR, John S, et al. Implementation Guidelines for The Canadian Emergency Department Triage & Acuity Scale (CTAS) 1998. https://ctas-phctas.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/ctased16_98.pdf https://ctas-phctas.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/ctased16_98.pdf
    1. Triage systems: a review of the literature with reference to Saudi Arabia. Qureshi NA. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20799600/ East Mediterr Health J. 2010;16:690–698. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources