Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec;46(1):2313177.
doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2024.2313177. Epub 2024 Feb 12.

Impact of electronic AKI alert/care bundle on AKI inpatient outcomes: a retrospective single-center cohort study

Affiliations

Impact of electronic AKI alert/care bundle on AKI inpatient outcomes: a retrospective single-center cohort study

Michael Chen-Xu et al. Ren Fail. 2024 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Outcomes among acute kidney injury (AKI) patients are poor in United Kingdom (UK) hospitals, and electronic alerts and care bundles may improve them. We implemented such a system at West Suffolk Hospital (WSH) called the 'AKI order set'. We aimed to assess its impact on all-cause mortality, length of stay (LOS) and renal function among AKI patients, and its utilization.

Methods: Retrospective, single-center cohort study of patients ≥ 18 years old with AKI at WSH, a 430-bed general hospital serving a rural UK population of approximately 280,000. 7243 unique AKI events representing 5728 patients with full data were identified automatically from our electronic health record (EHR) between 02 September 2018 and 1 July 2021 (median age 78 years, 51% male). All-cause mortality, LOS and improvement in AKI stage, demographic and comorbidity data, medications and AKI order set use were automatically collected from the EHR.

Results: The AKI order set was used in 9.8% of AKI events and was associated with 28% lower odds of all-cause mortality (multivariable odds ratio [OR] 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57-0.91). Median LOS was longer when the AKI order set was utilized than when not (11.8 versus 8.8 days, p < .001), but was independently associated with improvement in the AKI stage (28.9% versus 8.7%, p < .001; univariable OR 4.25, 95% CI 3.53-5.10, multivariable OR 4.27, 95% CI 3.54-5.14).

Conclusions: AKI order set use led to improvements in all-cause mortality and renal function, but longer LOS, among AKI patients at WSH.

Keywords: Acute kidney injury; care bundle; electronic alerting; quality improvement; renal failure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. The results presented in this paper have not been published previously in whole or part, except in abstract format.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The electronic AKI care plan (AKI-CP). Checkboxes on the left when checked lead to the ordering of specific urine and/or blood tests, denoted by the ‘clipboard’ icon, part of the AKI-CP, e.g., ‘Dipstick Urinalysis’, or ‘Urea and electrolytes, blood’. Text to the right of the ‘pinned note’ icon represent specific advice relevant for the management of AKI part of the AKI-CP, e.g., ‘Consider stopping nephrotoxics (ACE inhibitors/ARBs, diuretics, NSAIDs, antihypertensives, gentamycin, trimethoprim, metformin)’. The text to the right of the ‘document’ and ‘pinned note’ icons under the ‘Links’ heading are links to the local and national guidelines for the management of AKI.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
The interruptive electronic alert from the ‘AKI order set’. An example of the interruptive electronic alert from the ‘AKI order set’, which is triggered by AKI stage 2 or above. This alert provides information about the patient’s details, including their name, date of birth, age, location and Medical Records Number (MRN), and suggests that the use initiates the AKI-CP.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Utilization of the AKI care plan (AKI-CP) over time.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Standardized survival curves by initiation of the AKI-CP.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lameire NH, Bagga A, Cruz D, et al. . Acute kidney injury: an increasing global concern. Lancet. 2013;382(9887):1–9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60647-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hoste EAJ, Kellum JA, Selby NM, et al. . Global epidemiology and outcomes of acute kidney injury. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2018;14(10):607–625. doi: 10.1038/s41581-018-0052-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. NICE . Acute kidney injury: quality standard [QS76]. 2014.
    1. Challiner R, Ritchie JP, Fullwood C, et al. . Incidence and consequence of acute kidney injury in unselected emergency admissions to a large acute UK hospital trust. BMC Nephrol. 2014;15(1):84. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-15-84. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nadim MK, Forni LG, Mehta RL, et al. . COVID-19-associated acute kidney injury: consensus report of the 25th acute disease quality initiative (ADQI) workgroup. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2020;16(12):747–764. doi: 10.1038/s41581-020-00356-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed