Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Aug;28(3):276-301.
doi: 10.1177/10888683241228328. Epub 2024 Feb 12.

Power to Detect What? Considerations for Planning and Evaluating Sample Size

Affiliations
Review

Power to Detect What? Considerations for Planning and Evaluating Sample Size

Roger Giner-Sorolla et al. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2024 Aug.

Abstract

Academic abstract: In the wake of the replication crisis, social and personality psychologists have increased attention to power analysis and the adequacy of sample sizes. In this article, we analyze current controversies in this area, including choosing effect sizes, why and whether power analyses should be conducted on already-collected data, how to mitigate the negative effects of sample size criteria on specific kinds of research, and which power criterion to use. For novel research questions, we advocate that researchers base sample sizes on effects that are likely to be cost-effective for other people to implement (in applied settings) or to study (in basic research settings), given the limitations of interest-based minimums or field-wide effect sizes. We discuss two alternatives to power analysis, precision analysis and sequential analysis, and end with recommendations for improving the practices of researchers, reviewers, and journal editors in social-personality psychology.

Public abstract: Recently, social-personality psychology has been criticized for basing some of its conclusions on studies with low numbers of participants. As a result, power analysis, a mathematical way to ensure that a study has enough participants to reliably "detect" a given size of psychological effect, has become popular. This article describes power analysis and discusses some controversies about it, including how researchers should derive assumptions about effect size, and how the requirements of power analysis can be applied without harming research on hard-to-reach and marginalized communities. For novel research questions, we advocate that researchers base sample sizes on effects that are likely to be cost-effective for other people to implement (in applied settings) or to study (in basic research settings). We discuss two alternatives to power analysis, precision analysis and sequential analysis, and end with recommendations for improving the practices of researchers, reviewers, and journal editors in social-personality psychology.

Keywords: power analysis; research methods; sample size; statistics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Power Curves for a Simple Correlation Test, Given Different Population Values of the Correlation Coefficient Rho (r)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abelson R. P. (1985). A variance explanation paradox: When a little is a lot. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 129–133. 10.1037/0033-2909.97.1.129 - DOI
    1. Aberson C., Bostyn D. H., Carpenter T., Conrique B. G., Giner-Sorolla R., Lewis N. A., Jr., . . . Soderberg C. (2023). Techniques and solutions for sample size determination in psychology: A critical review. https://osf.io/gcb4d
    1. Albers C., Lakens D. (2018). When power analyses based on pilot data are biased: Inaccurate effect size estimators and follow-up bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74, 187–195. 10.1016/j.jesp.2017.09.004 - DOI
    1. American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.).
    1. American Psychological Association. (2022). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/psp