Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Feb 13;29(1):119.
doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01589-3.

Orthodontic camouflage treatment for a patient with bilateral cleft lip and palate, bilateral crossbite, and microdontic maxillary lateral incisors

Affiliations
Review

Orthodontic camouflage treatment for a patient with bilateral cleft lip and palate, bilateral crossbite, and microdontic maxillary lateral incisors

Lanxin Cheng et al. Eur J Med Res. .

Abstract

Cleft lip and palate is a congenital craniofacial anomaly that affects the lip and oral cavity. The management and orthodontic treatment of this anomaly is important but challenging. This article reports the successful treatment of a patient with bilateral cleft lip and palate, Class III malocclusion, bilateral crossbite, crowding and microdontic maxillary lateral incisors. One mandible incisor was extracted, and three miniscrew anchorages were utilized to distalize the maxillary left dental arch and retract the mandibular arch. After treatment, ideal occlusion and a better profile were established, and long-term stability was confirmed by a 4-year follow-up. This article represents a successful attempt of orthodontic camouflage treatment of severe dentofacial discrepancy, as an important part of the series treatment of cleft lip and palate, to provide some insight into the clinical field.

Keywords: Cleft lip and palate; Malocclusion; Mini-implant; Orthodontics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Pretreatment facial and intraoral photographs
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Pretreatment study models
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Pretreatment lateral radiograph and panoramic radiograph
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Pretreatment three-dimensional model reconstruction
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Initial alignment and leveling
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Implantation of mandibular OMIs
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Mandibular retraction by OMIs
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Posttreatment facial and intraoral photographs
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Posttreatment study models
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
Posttreatment lateral cephalogram and panoramic radiograph
Fig. 11
Fig. 11
Superimposed tracings
Fig. 12
Fig. 12
Four-year follow-up facial and intraoral photographs

Similar articles

References

    1. Mossey P, Little J, Munger R, Dixon M, Shaw W. Cleft Lip and palate. Lancet. 2009;374:1773–1785. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60695-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wadde K, Chowdhar A, Venkatakrishnan L, Ghodake M, Sachdev SS, Chhapane A. Protocols in the management of cleft lip and palate: a systematic review: running title: management of cleft lip and palate. Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022;21:101338. - PubMed
    1. Toffol LD, Pavoni C, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Cozza P. Orthopedic treatment outcomes in Class III malocclusion. A systematic review Angle Orthod. 2008;78:561–573. doi: 10.2319/030207-108.1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eslami S, Faber J, Fateh A, Sheikholaemmeh F, Grassia V, Jamilian A. Treatment decision in adult patients with class III malocclusion: surgery versus orthodontics. Prog Orthod. 2018;19:28. doi: 10.1186/s40510-018-0218-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. He J, Jiang L, Song S, Mo S. Transverse differences between cleft lip and palate and non-cleft palate with skeletal Class III malocclusion using buccolingual inclination: a cone-beam computed tomography retrospective study. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22:631–637. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02675-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed