Explaining decisions of a light-weight deep neural network for real-time coronary artery disease classification in magnetic resonance imaging
- PMID: 38348346
- PMCID: PMC10858933
- DOI: 10.1007/s11554-023-01411-7
Explaining decisions of a light-weight deep neural network for real-time coronary artery disease classification in magnetic resonance imaging
Abstract
In certain healthcare settings, such as emergency or critical care units, where quick and accurate real-time analysis and decision-making are required, the healthcare system can leverage the power of artificial intelligence (AI) models to support decision-making and prevent complications. This paper investigates the optimization of healthcare AI models based on time complexity, hyper-parameter tuning, and XAI for a classification task. The paper highlights the significance of a lightweight convolutional neural network (CNN) for analysing and classifying Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in real-time and is compared with CNN-RandomForest (CNN-RF). The role of hyper-parameter is also examined in finding optimal configurations that enhance the model's performance while efficiently utilizing the limited computational resources. Finally, the benefits of incorporating the XAI technique (e.g. GradCAM and Layer-wise Relevance Propagation) in providing transparency and interpretable explanations of AI model predictions, fostering trust, and error/bias detection are explored. Our inference time on a MacBook laptop for 323 test images of size 100x100 is only 2.6 sec, which is merely 8 milliseconds per image while providing comparable classification accuracy with the ensemble model of CNN-RF classifiers. Using the proposed model, clinicians/cardiologists can achieve accurate and reliable results while ensuring patients' safety and answering questions imposed by the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The proposed investigative study will advance the understanding and acceptance of AI systems in connected healthcare settings.
Keywords: Classification; Explainable AI; Healthcare models; Hyper-parameter tuning; Time complexity.
© The Author(s) 2024.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interestAll authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Tsao CW, Aday AW, Almarzooq ZI, Anderson CA, Arora P, Avery CL, Baker-Smith CM, Beaton AZ, Boehme AK, Buxton AE, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2023 update: a report from the american heart association. Circulation. 2023;147(8):e93–e621. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001123. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Brown, J. C., Gerhardt, T. E., Kwon, E.: “Risk factors for coronary artery disease,” 2020 - PubMed
-
- Knaapen, P.: “Computed tomography to replace invasive coronary angiography? close, but not close enough,” 2019 - PubMed
-
- Serruys PW, Hara H, Garg S, Kawashima H, Nørgaard BL, Dweck MR, Bax JJ, Knuuti J, Nieman K, Leipsic JA, et al. Coronary computed tomographic angiography for complete assessment of coronary artery disease: Jacc state-of-the-art review. J. Amer. Coll. Cardiol. 2021;78(7):713–736. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.06.019. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources