Spatial prey availability and pulsed reproductive tactics: Encounter risk in a canid-ungulate system
- PMID: 38348546
- DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.14056
Spatial prey availability and pulsed reproductive tactics: Encounter risk in a canid-ungulate system
Abstract
Predation risk is a function of spatiotemporal overlap between predator and prey, as well as behavioural responses during encounters. Dynamic factors (e.g. group size, prey availability and animal movement or state) affect risk, but rarely are integrated in risk assessments. Our work targets a system where predation risk is fundamentally linked to temporal patterns in prey abundance and behaviour. For neonatal ungulate prey, risk is defined within a short temporal window during which the pulse in parturition, increasing movement capacity with age and antipredation tactics have the potential to mediate risk. In our coyote-mule deer (Canis latrans-Odocoileus hemionus) system, leveraging GPS data collected from both predator and prey, we tested expectations of shared enemy and reproductive risk hypotheses. We asked two questions regarding risk: (A) How does primary and alternative prey habitat, predator and prey activity, and reproductive tactics (e.g. birth synchrony and maternal defence) influence the vulnerability of a neonate encountering a predator? (B) How do the same factors affect behaviour by predators relative to the time before and after an encounter? Despite increased selection for mule deer and intensified search behaviour by coyotes during the peak in mule deer parturition, mule deer were afforded protection from predation via predator swamping, experiencing reduced per-capita encounter risk when most neonates were born. Mule deer occupying rabbit habitat (Sylvilagus spp.; coyote's primary prey) experienced the greatest risk of encounter but the availability of rabbit habitat did not affect predator behaviour during encounters. Encounter risk increased in areas with greater availability of mule deer habitat: coyotes shifted their behaviour relative to deer habitat, and the pulse in mule deer parturition and movement of neonatal deer during encounters elicited increased speed and tortuosity by coyotes. In addition to the spatial distribution of prey, temporal patterns in prey availability and animal behavioural state were fundamental in defining risk. Our work reveals the nuanced consequences of pulsed availability on predation risk for alternative prey, whereby responses by predators to sudden resource availability, the lasting effects of diversionary prey and inherent antipredation tactics ultimately dictate risk.
Keywords: alternative prey; apparent competition; dynamic landscape of fear; hider‐follower; mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus); neonate (fawn); predator swamping; spatiotemporal overlap.
© 2024 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2024 British Ecological Society.
Similar articles
-
Coursing the mottled mosaic: Generalist predators track pulses in availability of neonatal ungulates.Ecol Evol. 2023 Jul 26;13(7):e10378. doi: 10.1002/ece3.10378. eCollection 2023 Jul. Ecol Evol. 2023. PMID: 37502310 Free PMC article.
-
Risky business: How an herbivore navigates spatiotemporal aspects of risk from competitors and predators.Ecol Appl. 2022 Oct;32(7):e2648. doi: 10.1002/eap.2648. Epub 2022 Jun 14. Ecol Appl. 2022. PMID: 35535971 Free PMC article.
-
Interactive effects of wildfires, season and predator activity shape mule deer movements.J Anim Ecol. 2022 Nov;91(11):2273-2288. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13810. Epub 2022 Sep 14. J Anim Ecol. 2022. PMID: 36071537
-
Fire as a driver and mediator of predator-prey interactions.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2022 Aug;97(4):1539-1558. doi: 10.1111/brv.12853. Epub 2022 Mar 23. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2022. PMID: 35320881 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The influence of human activity on predator-prey spatiotemporal overlap.J Anim Ecol. 2023 Jun;92(6):1124-1134. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13892. Epub 2023 Feb 7. J Anim Ecol. 2023. PMID: 36710603 Review.
Cited by
-
Intraseasonal variations in the spatial behaviour of an Arctic predator.Mov Ecol. 2025 Mar 4;13(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40462-024-00522-5. Mov Ecol. 2025. PMID: 40038802 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Adams, L. G., & Dale, B. W. (1998). Timing and synchrony of parturition in Alaskan caribou. Journal of Mammalogy, 79, 287–294.
-
- Apps, C. D., Mclellan, B. N., Kinley, T. A., Serrouya, R., Seip, D. R., & Wittmer, H. U. (2013). Spatial factors related to mortality and population decline of endangered mountain caribou. Journal of Wildlife Management, 77, 1409–1419.
-
- Bartel, R. A., & Knowlton, F. F. (2005). Functional feeding responses of coyotes, Canis latrans, to fluctuating prey abundance in the Curlew Valley, Utah, 1977–1993. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 83, 569–578.
-
- Bartel, R. A., Knowlton, F. F., & Stoddart, L. C. (2008). Long‐term patterns in mammalian abundance in northern portions of the Great Basin. Journal of Mammalogy, 89, 1170–1183.
-
- Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed‐effects models using {lme4}. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous