How to improve IARC's RF-EMF cancer hazard communication
- PMID: 38348555
- DOI: 10.1002/bem.22499
How to improve IARC's RF-EMF cancer hazard communication
Abstract
A crucial aspect of IARC's evaluation of the relative carcinogenicity of agents is the communication of its conclusions. The present paper addressed the experimental risk perception literature pertaining to IARC's radiofrequency electromagnetic field evaluation communication, and derived specific recommendations for improving it.
Keywords: IARC; risk communication; risk perception.
© 2024 The Authors. Bioelectromagnetics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Bioelectromagnetics Society.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Bodemer, N., Meder, B., Gigerenzer, G.: Communicating relative risk changes with baseline risk: presentation format and numeracy matter. Med. Decis. Making 34(5), 615–626 (2014)
-
- Cimpian, A., Brandone, A. C., Gelman, S. A.: Generic statements require little evidence for acceptance but have powerful implications. Cogn. Sci. 34(8), 1452–1482 (2010)
-
- Freudenstein, F., Boerner, F., Croft, R. J., Leung, R. W. S., Loughran, S. P., Wiedemann, P. M.: Effects of generalization descriptions on risk perception. Environ. Res. 223, 115422 (2023)
-
- Freudenstein, F., Croft, R. J., Loughran, S. P., Zeleke, B. M., Wiedemann, P. M.: Effects of selective outcome reporting on risk perception. Environ. Res. 196, 110821 (2021)
-
- Freudenstein, F., Croft, R. J., Wiedemann, P. M., Verrender, A., Böhmert, C., Loughran, S. P.: Framing effects in risk communication messages—hazard identification vs. risk assessment. Environ. Res. 190, 109934 (2020)
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical