Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 6;68(3):e0157923.
doi: 10.1128/aac.01579-23. Epub 2024 Feb 13.

Removal of common antimicrobial agents by sustained low-efficiency dialysis

Affiliations

Removal of common antimicrobial agents by sustained low-efficiency dialysis

Joanna Q Hudson et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. .

Abstract

Adequate dosing of antimicrobials is paramount for treating infections in critically ill patients undergoing kidney replacement therapy; however, little is known about antimicrobial removal by sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED). The objective was to quantify the removal of cefepime, daptomycin, meropenem, piperacillin-tazobactam, and vancomycin in patients undergoing SLED. Adult patients ≥18 years with acute kidney injury (AKI) or end-stage kidney disease receiving one of the select antimicrobials and requiring SLED were included. Blood and dialysate flow rates were maintained at 250 and 100 mL/min, respectively. Simultaneous arterial and venous blood samples for the analysis of antibiotic concentrations were collected hourly for 8 hours during SLED (on-SLED). Arterial samples were collected every 2 hours for up to 6 hours while not receiving SLED (off-SLED) for the calculation of SLED clearance, half-life (t1/2) on-SLED and off-SLED, and the fraction of removal by SLED (fD). Twenty-one patients completed the study: 52% male, mean age (±SD) 53 ± 13 years, and mean weight of 98 ± 30 kg. Eighty-six percent had AKI, and 4 patients were receiving cefepime, 3 daptomycin, 10 meropenem, 6 piperacillin-tazobactam, and 13 vancomycin. The average SLED time was 7.3 ± 1.1 hours, and the mean ultrafiltration rate was 95 ± 52 mL/hour (range 10-211). The t1/2 on-SLED was substantially lower than the off-SLED t1/2 for all antimicrobials, and the SLED fD varied between 44% and 77%. An 8-hour SLED session led to significant elimination of most antimicrobials evaluated. If SLED is performed, modification of the dosing regimen is warranted to avoid subtherapeutic concentrations.

Keywords: antimicrobials; end-stage kidney disease; kidney; pharmacokinetics; sustained low-efficiency dialysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Meropenem concentration vs time profile (patient #16). Meropenem concentrations measured during both on-SLED and off-SLED study periods.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Antimicrobial clearance reported for IHD, CKRT, and SLED (6–17). SLED data from this study. Antimicrobials: C= cefepime (6, 7), D=daptomycin (8, 9), M=meropenem (10, 11), P= piperacillin (12, 13), T=tazobactam (13, 14), and V=vancomycin (15, 16). *Meropenem clearance by IHD reported for a low flux filter.
Fig 3
Fig 3
Suggested antimicrobial dosing regimens for SLED performed daily.* *Base dosing on the estimated kidney function of the patient on non-SLED days. **Extended infusion method may be used. Higher doses may be warranted depending on severity of infection and source. BFR, blood flow rate; DFR, dialysate flow rate; LD, loading dose; SLED, sustained low efficiency dialysis; TDM, therapeutic drug monitoring.

References

    1. Edrees F, Li T, Vijayan A. 2016. Prolonged intermittent renal replacement therapy. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 23:195–202. doi:10.1053/j.ackd.2016.03.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Matzke GR, Aronoff GR, Atkinson AJ, Bennett WM, Decker BS, Eckardt KU, Golper T, Grabe DW, Kasiske B, Keller F, Kielstein JT, Mehta R, Mueller BA, Pasko DA, Schaefer F, Sica DA, Inker LA, Umans JG, Murray P. 2011. Drug dosing consideration in patients with acute and chronic kidney disease-a clinical update from kidney disease. Kidney Int 80:1122–1137. doi:10.1038/ki.2011.322 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bagshaw SM, Uchino S, Bellomo R, Morimatsu H, Morgera S, Schetz M, Tan I, Bouman C, Macedo E, Gibney N, Tolwani A, Oudemans-van Straaten HM, Ronco C, Kellum JA, Beginning and Ending Supportive Therapy for the Kidney (BEST Kidney) Investigators . 2007. Septic acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: clinical characteristics and outcomes. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2:431–439. doi:10.2215/CJN.03681106 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Roberts JA, Abdul-Aziz MH, Lipman J, Mouton JW, Vinks AA, Felton TW, Hope WW, Farkas A, Neely MN, Schentag JJ, Drusano G, Frey OR, Theuretzbacher U, Kuti JL, International Society of Anti-Infective Pharmacology and the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics Study Group of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases . 2014. Individualised antibiotic dosing for patients who are critically ill: challenges and potential solutions. Lancet Infect Dis 14:498–509. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70036-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Charlton M, Thompson JP. 2019. Pharmacokinetics in sepsis. BJA Educ 19:7–13. doi:10.1016/j.bjae.2018.09.006 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources