Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 14;22(1):24.
doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01106-w.

Future directions for patient engagement in research: a participatory workshop with Canadian patient partners and academic researchers

Collaborators, Affiliations

Future directions for patient engagement in research: a participatory workshop with Canadian patient partners and academic researchers

Anna Maria Chudyk et al. Health Res Policy Syst. .

Abstract

Background: Patient engagement in research (also commonly referred to as patient or patient and public involvement in research) strives to transform health research wherein patients (including caregivers and the public) are regularly and actively engaged as multidisciplinary research team members (i.e. patient partners) working jointly towards improved health outcomes and an enhanced healthcare system. To support its mindful evolution into a staple of health research, this participatory study aimed to identify future directions for Canadian patient engagement in research and discusses its findings in the context of the international literature.

Methods: The study met its aim through a multi-meeting pan-Canadian virtual workshop. Participants (n = 30) included Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research-funded academic researchers and patient partners identified through a publicly available database, personal and professional networks and social media. All spoke English, could access the workshop virtually, and provided written informed consent. The workshop was composed of four, 1.5-3-h virtual meetings wherein participants discussed the current and preferred future states of Canadian patient engagement in research. Workshop discussions (i.e. data) were video and audio recorded. Themes were generated through an iterative process of inductive thematic analysis that occurred concurrently with the multi-week workshop.

Results: Our participatory and iterative process identified 10 targetable areas of focus for the future of Canadian patient engagement in research. Five were categorized as system-level (systemic integration; academic culture; engagement networks; funding models; compensation models), one as researcher-level (engagement processes), and four crossed both levels (awareness; diversity and recruitment; training, tools and education; evaluation and impact). System level targetable areas called for reshaping the patient engagement ecosystem to create a legitimized and supportive space for patient engagement to be a staple component of a learning health system. Researcher level targetable areas called for academic researchers and patient partners to collaboratively generate evidence and apply knowledge to inform values and behaviours necessary to foster and sustain supportive health research spaces that are accessible to all.

Conclusions: Future directions for Canadian patient engagement in research span 10 interconnected targetable areas that require strong leadership and joint action between patient partners, academic researchers, and health and research institutions if patient engagement is to become a ubiquitous component of a learning health system.

Keywords: Capacity building; Multi-stakeholder engagement; Participatory process; Participatory workshop; Patient and public involvement; Patient engagement; Patient engagement in research; Patient involvement; Patient-oriented research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Workshop overview
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Conceptual summary of study findings

References

    1. Jacobs SD. A history and analysis of the evolution of action and participatory action research. Can J Action Res. 2018;19(3):34–52. doi: 10.33524/cjar.v19i3.412. - DOI
    1. Adelman C. Kurt Lewin and the origins of action research. Educ Action Res. 1993;1(1):7–24. doi: 10.1080/0965079930010102. - DOI
    1. Macaulay AC. Participatory research: what is the history? Has the purpose changed? Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017. pp. 256–258. - PubMed
    1. Orlowski P. Freirean conceptions of participatory action research and teaching for social justice-same struggle, different fronts. Can J Action Res. 2019;20(1):30–51. doi: 10.33524/cjar.v20i1.445. - DOI
    1. Freire P. Pedagogy of the oppressed (revised) New York: Continuum. 1996;356:357–358.

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources