Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Jul;281(7):3557-3568.
doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08478-3. Epub 2024 Feb 13.

Predicting residual cholesteatoma with the Potsic staging system still lacks evidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Predicting residual cholesteatoma with the Potsic staging system still lacks evidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Klára Borbála Körmendy et al. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Jul.

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the rate of residual disease in the Potsic staging system for congenital cholesteatomas.

Methods: A protocol registration was published on PROSPERO (CRD42022383932), describing residual disease as a primary outcome and hearing improvement as secondary. A systematic search was performed in four databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science) on December 14, 2022. Articles were included if cholesteatomas were staged according to the Potsic system and follow-up duration was documented. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Quality In Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. In the statistical synthesis a random effects model was used. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed using I2.

Results: Thirteen articles were found to be eligible for systematic review and seven were included in the meta-analysis section. All records were retrospective cohort studies with high risk of bias. Regarding the proportions of residual disease, analysis using the χ2 test showed no statistically significant difference between Potsic stages after a follow-up of minimum one year (stage I 0.06 (confidence interval (CI) 0.01-0.33); stage II 0.20 (CI 0.09-0.38); stage III 0.06 (CI 0.00-0.61); stage IV: 0.17 (CI 0.01-0.81)). Postoperative and preoperative hearing outcomes could not be analyzed due to varied reporting. Results on cholesteatoma location and mean age at staging were consistent with those previously published.

Conclusion: No statistically significant difference was found in the proportions of residual disease between Potsic stages, thus the staging system's applicability for outcome prediction could not be proven based on the available data. Targeted studies are needed for a higher level of evidence.

Keywords: Congenital cholesteatoma; Potsic; Residual cholesteatoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no competing non- or financial interests to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flowchart of the selection process, which started with 6,616 articles and included 13 articles included in the review and 7 included in the meta-analysis section
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Forest plot showing the proportion of residual disease from the total number of patients after 1 year in four stages of the Potsic staging system for congenital cholesteatoma
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Bar chart depicting the quadrants of the tympanic membrane cholesteatomas are most commonly visible through in each stage as documented in the key articles 20, 22–26, 28, 29
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Mean age (years) at staging for patients diagnosed with congenital cholesteatoma in our key articles

References

    1. Potsic WP, Samadi DS, Marsh RR, Wetmore RF. A staging system for congenital cholesteatoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;128:1009–1012. doi: 10.1001/archotol.128.9.1009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bennett M, Warren F, Jackson GC, Kaylie D. Congenital cholesteatoma: theories, facts, and 53 patients. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2006;39:1081–1094. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2006.08.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gilberto N, Custódio S, Colaço T, Santos R, Sousa P, Escada P. Middle ear congenital cholesteatoma: systematic review, meta-analysis and insights on its pathogenesis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;277:987–998. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-05792-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hróbjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness LA, Stewart LA, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Welch VA, Whiting P, Moher D. The prisma 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Higgins JPT, TJ, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (2022) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.3 (updated February 2022). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews - PMC - PubMed

Supplementary concepts

LinkOut - more resources