2-Hydroxyethyl methacrylate (2-HEMA) sensitization, a global epidemic at its peak in Spain?
- PMID: 38351475
- DOI: 10.1111/cod.14520
2-Hydroxyethyl methacrylate (2-HEMA) sensitization, a global epidemic at its peak in Spain?
Abstract
Background: A global epidemic of allergic contact dermatitis to (meth)acrylates has been described in relation to the widespread use of manicure products.
Objectives: To evaluate the frequency of sensitization to 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (2-HEMA) among consecutively patch tested patients with eczema in Spain; the percentage of current relevance; the MOAHLFA index; and, the potential sources of exposure to (meth)acrylates.
Methods: From January 2019 to December 2022, 2-HEMA 2% pet. was prospectively patch tested in 24 REIDAC (Spanish Allergic Contact Dermatitis Registry) centres.
Results: Six thousand one hundred thirty-four patients were consecutively patch tested with 2-HEMA 2% pet. 265/6134 (4.3%) were positive. Positive reactions of current relevance were identified to involve 184/265 (69%). The efficiency (number of patch tests needed to detect relevant positive patch test reactions) was 34 (6134/184). The variable 'occupational' was found to be significantly associated with a higher risk for relevant positive reactions to 2-HEMA (OR: 10.9; 95% CI: 8.1-14.9).
Conclusion: (Meth)acrylate sensitization is a prevalent health issue in Spain. 2-HEMA 2% pet. has been identified to be a highly effective (meth)acrylate allergy marker in the GEIDAC baseline series. The responsible authorities should implement policies guaranteeing accurate labelling of industrial, medical, and consumer materials while ensuring the enforcement of said labelling through appropriate legal means.
Keywords: (meth)acrylates; 2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate; acrylates; acrylic nails; allergic contact dermatitis; beauticians; occupational; patch test; prevalence; semi‐permanent nail polish.
© 2024 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Sasseville D. Acrylates in contact dermatitis. Dermatitis. 2012;23:6‐16.
-
- Conde‐Salazar L, Guimaraens D, Romero LV. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from anaerobic acrylic sealant. Contact Dermatitis. 1988;18:129‐132.
-
- Canizares O. Contact dermatitis due to the acrylic materials used in artificial nails. AMA Arch Derm. 1956;74:141‐143.
-
- Marrero‐Alemán G, Sabater‐Abad J, Miquel FJ, BoixVilanova J, Mestre Bauzá F, Borrego L. Allergic contact dermatitis to (meth)acrylates involving nail technicians and users: prognosis and differential diagnosis. Allergy. 2019;74(7):1386‐1389.
-
- Gatica‐Ortega ME, Pastor‐Nieto MA, Silvestre‐Salvador JF. Allergic contact dermatitis from acrylates in long lasting nail polish. Actas Dermosifilogr. 2018;109(6):508‐514.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
