Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May;170(5):1372-1379.
doi: 10.1002/ohn.673. Epub 2024 Feb 14.

Assessment of Swallowing Function in Healthy Adults While Using High-Flow Nasal Cannula

Alexander E Graf  1 , Alla Mehl  2 , Amelia De Costa  2 , Richard M Rosenfeld  1 , Sara Abu-Ghanem  1   3
Affiliations

Assessment of Swallowing Function in Healthy Adults While Using High-Flow Nasal Cannula

Alexander E Graf et al. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 May.

Abstract

Objective: Despite widespread use of high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) for respiratory support, the effect of HFNC on swallowing physiology is poorly understood. Flow rates that permit safe swallowing have not been established. We aim to assess if healthy individuals have diminished swallowing function and safety at high flow rates.

Study design: Repeated measures with planned data collection.

Setting: Outpatient dysphagia clinic.

Methods: Swallowing function in a cohort of healthy individuals was assessed using Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES). Participants' safety of swallowing was assessed with different textures under randomized rates of HFNC (0, 30, 40, 50, and 60 LPM). Swallowing trials included quantities of thin liquids, mildly-thick liquids, and purees. Trials were scored using the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS). Pearson chi-square tests were used to test for correlation between PAS result, flow rate, and consistency across each quantity of material.

Results: Twenty-seven subjects were enrolled. Forty-one percent were male with mean age of 34 years (11 standard deviation). Ninety-nine percent (267/270), 97% (n = 263/270), and 99% (399/405) of 1 sip swallows, 3 sip swallows, and 5 mL swallows, respectively, were safe. There was no significant correlation between swallow safety and flow rate using Pearson Chi-Square test across all consistencies and across all quantities of materials (P > 0.05). Of note, out of all subtrials, the thin liquid, 3 sips trial at 60 LPM, had the largest percent of unsafe swallows (14%).

Conclusion: Our results suggest rate of aspiration is not significantly affected by high flow nasal cannula in healthy individuals.

Keywords: aspiration; dysphagia; fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing; high flow nasal cannula; penetration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mauri T, Turrini C, Eronia N, et al. Physiologic effects of high‐flow nasal cannula in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;195(9):1207‐1215.
    1. Rochwerg B, Einav S, Chaudhuri D, et al. The role for high flow nasal cannula as a respiratory support strategy in adults: a clinical practice guideline. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46(12):2226‐2237.
    1. Tadié JM, Behm E, Lecuyer L, et al. Post‐intubation laryngeal injuries and extubation failure: a fiberoptic endoscopic study. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36(6):991‐998.
    1. Barquist E, Brown M, Cohn S, Lundy D, Jackowski J. Postextubation fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing after prolonged endotracheal intubation: a randomized, prospective trial. Crit Care Med. 2001;29(9):1710‐1713.
    1. Adair CG, Gorman SP, Feron BM, et al. Implications of endotracheal tube biofilm for ventilator‐associated pneumonia. Intensive Care Med. 1999;25(10):1072‐1076.

LinkOut - more resources