Clinical outcome and survival rate of condylar constrained knee prosthesis in revision total knee arthroplasty: an average nine point six year follow-up
- PMID: 38353709
- DOI: 10.1007/s00264-024-06096-6
Clinical outcome and survival rate of condylar constrained knee prosthesis in revision total knee arthroplasty: an average nine point six year follow-up
Abstract
Purpose: Condylar constrained knee prostheses (CCK) are increasingly used in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA), but the clinical effectiveness and long-term survival remain a debate. The purpose of this study is to report the long-term clinical and radiographic outcome, implant survival rate, and surgical safety of revision total knee arthroplasty with condylar constrained knee prosthesis.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed on patients undergoing rTKA with CCK. The cases who received rTKA with CCK from January 2005 to January 2022 were selected. The duration of operation, the estimated perioperative blood loss, and the intraoperative blood transfusion rate were recorded to evaluate surgical safety. The pain visual analog scale (VAS), range of motion (ROM), the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, the Knee Society Score (KSS), the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and the Oxford knee score (OKS) was recorded to assess clinical outcome. Standard anteroposterior, lateral, skyline and long-standing AP radiographs of the lower limbs were conducted to assess radiographic outcome. Implant survival was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier survival estimates.
Results: Fifty-five cases were followed up for an average of 9.6 years (1-18 years), including 16 males and 38 females, with an average age of 66 and an average BMI of 26.9 kg/m2. The main reasons for revision were periprosthetic infection (32 knees, 58.2%) and aseptic loosening (13 knees, 23.6%). The duration of operation was 149 ± 56.2 min. The perioperative blood loss was 973.6 ± 421.6 ml. At the last follow-up, VAS (8.0 ± 1.1 to 1.3 ± 1.4), ROM (82.7° ± 26.1° to 108.4° ± 11.8°), HSS (45.0 ± 10.4 to 85.3 ± 8.6), KSKS (38.4 ± 12.1 to 88.5 ± 12.0), KSFS (19.6 ± 12.9 to 68.8 ± 15.1), WOMAC (67.9 ± 12.5 to 14.4 ± 9.5), and OKS (9.9 ± 4.2 to 41.6 ± 7.7) were significantly improved (P < 0.001). A total of five complications were observed, all of which were periprosthetic infection. Non-progressive radiolucent lines were observed in 26 knees (47.3%). The 10-year survival rate for no operation was 96.0%. The ten year survival rate for no revision was 98.0%.
Conclusion: The use of CCK prosthesis for rTKA can achieve good long-term efficacy and prosthesis survival.
Keywords: Clinical results; Constrained condylar knee; Revision; Survival analysis; Total knee arthroplasty.
© 2024. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to SICOT aisbl.
Similar articles
-
Varus-Valgus Constrained Prostheses in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Study of Mid- to Long-Term Outcomes.Cureus. 2025 Jan 31;17(1):e78273. doi: 10.7759/cureus.78273. eCollection 2025 Jan. Cureus. 2025. PMID: 40026954 Free PMC article.
-
Results of a Second-generation Constrained Condylar Prosthesis in Complex Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Mean 5.5-Year Follow-up.Chin Med J (Engl). 2016 Jun 5;129(11):1334-9. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.182845. Chin Med J (Engl). 2016. PMID: 27231172 Free PMC article.
-
Rate of complications and short-term Functional Results of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Tibio-femoral Instability: do stability and range of motion are restored in 62 revisions.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2025 Feb;111(1):103986. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103986. Epub 2024 Sep 4. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2025. PMID: 39241908 Review.
-
Long-term outcomes of primary constrained condylar knee arthroplasty.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015 Jun;101(4):449-54. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.01.020. Epub 2015 May 4. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015. PMID: 25952710
-
Satisfactory mid-term outcomes of condylar-constrained knee implants in primary total knee arthroplasty: clinical and radiological follow-up.J Orthop Traumatol. 2020 Dec 2;21(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s10195-020-00561-9. J Orthop Traumatol. 2020. PMID: 33263831 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Varus-Valgus Constrained Prostheses in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Study of Mid- to Long-Term Outcomes.Cureus. 2025 Jan 31;17(1):e78273. doi: 10.7759/cureus.78273. eCollection 2025 Jan. Cureus. 2025. PMID: 40026954 Free PMC article.
-
Novel post-cam endoskeleton-reinforced posterior-stabilized cement articulating spacer reduced the rate of mechanical complications in prosthetic knee infection.J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 May 23;20(1):501. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05938-2. J Orthop Surg Res. 2025. PMID: 40410891 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Castagnini F, Sudanese A, Bordini B, Tassinari E, Stea S, Toni A (2017) Total knee replacement in young patients: survival and causes of revision in a registry population. J Arthroplasty 32:3368–3372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.05.052 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Long H, Xie D, Zeng C, Wang H, Lei G, Yang T (2023) Burden and characteristics of revision total knee arthroplasty in China: a national study based on hospitalized cases. J Arthroplasty 38:1320-1325.e1322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2023.02.052 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Moussa ME, Lee YY, Patel AR, Westrich GH (2017) Clinical outcomes following the use of constrained condylar knees in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 32:1869–1873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.001 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Pitta M, Esposito CI, Li Z, Lee YY, Wright TM, Padgett DE (2018) Failure after modern total knee arthroplasty: a prospective study of 18,065 knees. J Arthroplasty 33:407–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.09.041 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Mancuso F, Beltrame A, Colombo E, Miani E, Bassini F (2017) Management of metaphyseal bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty. Acta Biomed 88:98–111. https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v88i2-S.6520 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical