Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 22;29(3):194-200.
doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112620.

Rapid reviews methods series: guidance on rapid qualitative evidence synthesis

Affiliations

Rapid reviews methods series: guidance on rapid qualitative evidence synthesis

Andrew Booth et al. BMJ Evid Based Med. .

Abstract

This paper forms part of a series of methodological guidance from the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group and addresses rapid qualitative evidence syntheses (QESs), which use modified systematic, transparent and reproducible methodsu to accelerate the synthesis of qualitative evidence when faced with resource constraints. This guidance covers the review process as it relates to synthesis of qualitative research. 'Rapid' or 'resource-constrained' QES require use of templates and targeted knowledge user involvement. Clear definition of perspectives and decisions on indirect evidence, sampling and use of existing QES help in targeting eligibility criteria. Involvement of an information specialist, especially in prioritising databases, targeting grey literature and planning supplemental searches, can prove invaluable. Use of templates and frameworks in study selection and data extraction can be accompanied by quality assurance procedures targeting areas of likely weakness. Current Cochrane guidance informs selection of tools for quality assessment and of synthesis method. Thematic and framework synthesis facilitate efficient synthesis of large numbers of studies or plentiful data. Finally, judicious use of Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach for assessing the Confidence of Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research assessments and of software as appropriate help to achieve a timely and useful review product.

Keywords: Patient Care; Systematic Reviews as Topic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: AB is co-convenor of the Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group. In the last 36 months, he received royalties from Systematic Approaches To a Successful Literature Review (Sage 3rd edition), honoraria from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and travel support from the WHO. JN is lead convenor of the Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group. In the last 36 months, she has received honoraria from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and travel support from the WHO. CH is co-convenor of the Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Klerings I, Robalino S, Booth A, et al. . Rapid reviews methods series: guidance on literature search. BMJ Evid Based Med 2023;28:412–7. 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112079 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nussbaumer-Streit B, Sommer I, Hamel C, et al. . Rapid reviews methods series: guidance on team considerations, study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment. BMJ Evid Based Med 2023;28:418–23. 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112185 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Garritty C, Tricco AC, Smith M, et al. . Rapid reviews methods series: involving patient and public partners, healthcare providers and policymakers as knowledge users. BMJ Evid Based Med 2024;29:55–61. 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112070 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gartlehner G, Nussbaumer-Streit B, Devane D, et al. . Rapid reviews methods series: guidance on assessing the certainty of evidence. BMJ Evid Based Med 2024;29:50–4. 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112111 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. NHS Scotland . A guide to conducting rapid qualitative evidence synthesis for health technology assessment; 2019. Healthcare improvement Scotland