Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 14;24(1):56.
doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02341-2.

Construction and validation of a predictive model of invasive adenocarcinoma in pure ground-glass nodules less than 2 cm in diameter

Affiliations

Construction and validation of a predictive model of invasive adenocarcinoma in pure ground-glass nodules less than 2 cm in diameter

Mengchao Xue et al. BMC Surg. .

Abstract

Objectives: In this study, we aimed to develop a multiparameter prediction model to improve the diagnostic accuracy of invasive adenocarcinoma in pulmonary pure glass nodules.

Method: We included patients with pulmonary pure glass nodules who underwent lung resection and had a clear pathology between January 2020 and January 2022 at the Qilu Hospital of Shandong University. We collected data on the clinical characteristics of the patients as well as their preoperative biomarker results and computed tomography features. Thereafter, we performed univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to identify independent risk factors, which were then used to develop a prediction model and nomogram. We then evaluated the recognition ability of the model via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and assessed its calibration ability using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and calibration curves. Further, to assess the clinical utility of the nomogram, we performed decision curve analysis.

Result: We included 563 patients, comprising 174 and 389 cases of invasive and non-invasive adenocarcinoma, respectively, and identified seven independent risk factors, namely, maximum tumor diameter, age, serum amyloid level, pleural effusion sign, bronchial sign, tumor location, and lobulation. The area under the ROC curve was 0.839 (95% CI: 0.798-0.879) for the training cohort and 0.782 (95% CI: 0.706-0.858) for the validation cohort, indicating a relatively high predictive accuracy for the nomogram. Calibration curves for the prediction model also showed good calibration for both cohorts, and decision curve analysis showed that the clinical prediction model has clinical utility.

Conclusion: The novel nomogram thus constructed for identifying invasive adenocarcinoma in patients with isolated pulmonary pure glass nodules exhibited excellent discriminatory power, calibration capacity, and clinical utility.

Keywords: Invasive adenocarcinoma; Logical model; Nomogram; Prediction; Pulmonary pure glass nodule.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of patient selection through the study. AAH, atypical adenomatous hyperplasia; AIS, adenocarcinoma in situ; MIA, microinvasive adenocarcinoma; IAC, invasive adenocarcinoma
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Multi-factor logistic regression analysis of forest plots. PNI, prognostic nutritional index; SA, serum amyloid; Cyfra21-1, cytokeratin 19-fragments; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Nomogram for predicting the probability of IAC for pGGN ≤ 2 cm. SA, serum amyloid
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
ROC curves of nomograms predicting IAC for pGGN ≤ 2 cm in the training and validation groups. ROC, receiver operating characteristic; AUC, area under the ROC curve; IAC, invasive adenocarcinoma; pGGN, pure ground glass nodule
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
(A, B): Calibration curves of the prediction nomogram in the training cohort (A) and validation cohort (B). IAC, invasive adenocarcinoma; pGGN, pure ground glass nodule
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
(A, B): Decision curve analysis of predicted nomogram in the training cohort (A) and validation cohort (B)
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
(A, B): Clinical impact curves of predicted nomogram in the training cohort (A) and validation cohort (B)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wu FZ, Huang YL, Wu CC, Tang EK, Chen CS, Mar GY, et al. Assessment of Selection Criteria for low-dose lung screening CT among Asian ethnic groups in Taiwan: from Mass Screening to specific risk-based screening for Non-smoker Lung Cancer. Clin Lung Cancer. 2016;17(5):e45–e56. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2016.03.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lin KF, Wu HF, Huang WC, Tang PL, Wu MT, Wu FZ. Propensity score analysis of lung cancer risk in a population with high prevalence of non-smoking related lung cancer. BMC Pulm Med. 2017;17(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12890-017-0465-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wu FZ, Huang YL, Wu YJ, Tang EK, Wu MT, Chen CS, et al. Prognostic effect of implementation of the mass low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening program: a hospital-based cohort study. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2020;29(5):445–51. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000569. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Austin JH, Müller NL, Friedman PJ, Hansell DM, Naidich DP, Remy-Jardin M, et al. Glossary of terms for CT of the lungs: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee of the Fleischner Society. Radiology. 1996;200(2):327–31. doi: 10.1148/radiology.200.2.8685321. - DOI - PubMed