Searching for the "Holy Grail" of breast cancer recurrence risk: a narrative review of the hunt for a better biomarker and the promise of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)
- PMID: 38355821
- DOI: 10.1007/s10549-024-07253-6
Searching for the "Holy Grail" of breast cancer recurrence risk: a narrative review of the hunt for a better biomarker and the promise of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)
Abstract
Background: This paper is a narrative review of a major clinical challenge at the heart of breast cancer care: determining which patients are at risk of recurrence, which require systemic therapy, and which remain at risk in the survivorship phase of care despite initial therapy.
Methods: We review the literature on prognostic and predictive biomarkers in breast cancer with a focus on detection of minimal residual disease.
Results: While we have many tools to estimate and refine risk that are used to individualize local and systemic therapy, we know that we continue to over treat many patients and undertreat others. Many patients also experience what is, at least in hindsight, needless fear of recurrence. In this review, we frame this dilemma for the practicing breast oncologist and discuss the search for what we term the "holy grail" of breast cancer evaluation: the ideal biomarker of residual distant disease. We review the history of attempts to address this problem and the up-to-date science on biomarkers, circulating tumor cells and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA).
Conclusion: This review suggests that the emerging promise of ctDNA may help resolve a crticical dilemma at the heart of breast cancer care, and improve prognostication, treatment selection, and outcomes for patients with breast cancer.
Keywords: Biomarkers; Breast cancer; Circulating tumor DNA.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Minimal residue disease detection in early-stage breast cancer: a review.Mol Biol Rep. 2025 Jan 7;52(1):106. doi: 10.1007/s11033-024-10198-0. Mol Biol Rep. 2025. PMID: 39777588 Review.
-
Ultrasensitive Detection and Monitoring of Circulating Tumor DNA Using Structural Variants in Early-Stage Breast Cancer.Clin Cancer Res. 2025 Apr 14;31(8):1520-1532. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-3472. Clin Cancer Res. 2025. PMID: 39785866 Free PMC article.
-
Longitudinal monitoring of circulating tumor DNA to detect relapse early and predict outcome in early breast cancer.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Feb;209(3):493-502. doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07508-2. Epub 2024 Oct 18. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025. PMID: 39424680 Free PMC article.
-
Detection of minimal residual disease and prediction of recurrence in breast cancer using a plasma-only circulating tumor DNA assay.ESMO Open. 2025 Apr;10(4):104296. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.104296. Epub 2025 Mar 22. ESMO Open. 2025. PMID: 40120523 Free PMC article.
-
Circulating tumour DNA as a promising biomarker for breast cancer diagnosis & treatment monitoring.Indian J Med Res. 2025 Mar;161(3):267-277. doi: 10.25259/IJMR_1291_2024. Indian J Med Res. 2025. PMID: 40347499 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Circulating Tumor DNA in Early and Metastatic Breast Cance-Current Role and What Is Coming Next.Cancers (Basel). 2024 Nov 22;16(23):3919. doi: 10.3390/cancers16233919. Cancers (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39682108 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Integration of Bioinformatics and Machine Learning to Identify CD8+ T Cell-Related Prognostic Signature to Predict Clinical Outcomes and Treatment Response in Breast Cancer Patients.Genes (Basel). 2024 Aug 19;15(8):1093. doi: 10.3390/genes15081093. Genes (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39202452 Free PMC article.
-
Minimal residue disease detection in early-stage breast cancer: a review.Mol Biol Rep. 2025 Jan 7;52(1):106. doi: 10.1007/s11033-024-10198-0. Mol Biol Rep. 2025. PMID: 39777588 Review.
-
Circulating biomarkers for diagnosis and response to therapies in cancer patients.Int Rev Cell Mol Biol. 2025;391:1-41. doi: 10.1016/bs.ircmb.2024.08.007. Epub 2024 Sep 5. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol. 2025. PMID: 39939074 Review.
References
-
- Ahmad A (2019) Breast cancer statistics: recent trends. Adv Exp Med Biol 1152:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20301-6_1 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Pedersen RN, Esen BO, Mellemkjaer L, Christiansen P, Ejlertsen B, Lash TL, Norgaard M, Cronin-Fenton D (2022) The incidence of breast cancer recurrence 10–32 years after primary diagnosis. J Natl Cancer Inst 114:391–399. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djab202 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Allison KH, Hammond MEH, Dowsett M, McKernin SE, Carey LA, Fitzgibbons PL, Hayes DF, Lakhani SR, Chavez-MacGregor M, Perlmutter J, Perou CM, Regan MM, Rimm DL, Symmans WF, Torlakovic EE, Varella L, Viale G, Weisberg TF, McShane LM, Wolff AC (2020) Estrogen and progesterone receptor testing in breast cancer: ASCO/CAP guideline update. J Clin Oncol 38:1346–1366. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.19.02309 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Wolff AC, Hammond MEH, Allison KH, Harvey BE, Mangu PB, Bartlett JM, Bilous M, Ellis IO, Fitzgibbons P, Hanna W (2018) Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline focused update. Arch Pathol Lab Med 142:1364–1382 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical