ICP wave morphology as a screening test to exclude intracranial hypertension in brain-injured patients: a non-invasive perspective
- PMID: 38355918
- DOI: 10.1007/s10877-023-01120-3
ICP wave morphology as a screening test to exclude intracranial hypertension in brain-injured patients: a non-invasive perspective
Abstract
Intracranial hypertension (IH) is a life-threating condition especially for the brain injured patient. In such cases, an external ventricular drain (EVD) or an intraparenchymal bolt are the conventional gold standard for intracranial pressure (ICPi) monitoring. However, these techniques have several limitations. Therefore, identifying an ideal screening method for IH is important to avoid the unnecessary placement of ICPi and expedite its introduction in patients who require it. A potential screening tool is the ICP wave morphology (ICPW) which changes according to the intracranial volume-pressure curve. Specifically, the P2/P1 ratio of the ICPW has shown promise as a triage test to indicate normal ICP. In this study, we propose evaluating the noninvasive ICPW (nICPW-B4C sensor) as a screening method for ICPi monitoring in patients with moderate to high probability of IH. This is a retrospective analysis of a prospective, multicenter study that recruited adult patients requiring ICPi monitoring from both Federal University of São Paulo and University of São Paulo Medical School Hospitals. ICPi values and the nICPW parameters were obtained from both the invasive and the noninvasive methods simultaneously 5 min after the closure of the EVD drainage. ICP assessment was performed using a catheter inserted into the ventricle and connected to a pressure transducer and a drainage system. The B4C sensor was positioned on the patient's scalp without the need for trichotomy, surgical incision or trepanation, and the morphology of the ICP waves acquired through a strain sensor that can detect and monitor skull bone deformations caused by changes in ICP. All patients were monitored using this noninvasive system for at least 10 min per session. The area under the curve (AUC) was used to describe discriminatory power of the P2/P1 ratio for IH, with emphasis in the Negative Predictive value (NPV), based on the Youden index, and the negative likelihood ratio [LR-]. Recruitment occurred from August 2017 to March 2020. A total of 69 patients fulfilled inclusion and exclusion criteria in the two centers and a total of 111 monitorizations were performed. The mean P2/P1 ratio value in the sample was 1.12. The mean P2/P1 value in the no IH population was 1.01 meanwhile in the IH population was 1.32 (p < 0.01). The best Youden index for the mean P2/P1 ratio was with a cut-off value of 1.13 showing a sensitivity of 93%, specificity of 60%, and a NPV of 97%, as well as an AUC of 0.83 to predict IH. With the 1.13 cut-off value for P2/P1 ratio, the LR- for IH was 0.11, corresponding to a strong performance in ruling out the condition (IH), with an approximate 45% reduction in condition probability after a negative test (ICPW). To conclude, the P2/P1 ratio of the noninvasive ICP waveform showed in this study a high Negative Predictive Value and Likelihood Ratio in different acute neurological conditions to rule out IH. As a result, this parameter may be beneficial in situations where invasive methods are not feasible or unavailable and to screen high-risk patients for potential invasive ICP monitoring.Trial registration: At clinicaltrials.gov under numbers NCT05121155 (Registered 16 November 2021-retrospectively registered) and NCT03144219 (Registered 30 September 2022-retrospectively registered).
Keywords: Computed tomography; ICP wave morphology; Intracranial compliance; Intracranial pressure; Neuro-ICU; Noninvasive intracranial pressure monitor; Stroke; Subarachnoid hemorrhage; Transcranial Doppler.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.
Similar articles
-
Waveform Morphology as a Surrogate for ICP Monitoring: A Comparison Between an Invasive and a Noninvasive Method.Neurocrit Care. 2022 Aug;37(1):219-227. doi: 10.1007/s12028-022-01477-4. Epub 2022 Mar 24. Neurocrit Care. 2022. PMID: 35332426 Free PMC article.
-
Predicting short-term outcomes in brain-injured patients: a comprehensive approach with transcranial Doppler and intracranial compliance assessment.J Clin Monit Comput. 2024 Dec;38(6):1237-1247. doi: 10.1007/s10877-024-01181-y. Epub 2024 Jun 6. J Clin Monit Comput. 2024. PMID: 38844603 Free PMC article.
-
Noninvasive intracranial pressure waveforms for estimation of intracranial hypertension and outcome prediction in acute brain-injured patients.J Clin Monit Comput. 2023 Jun;37(3):753-760. doi: 10.1007/s10877-022-00941-y. Epub 2022 Nov 18. J Clin Monit Comput. 2023. PMID: 36399214 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The use of noninvasive measurements of intracranial pressure in patients with traumatic brain injury: a narrative review.Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2023 Jun;81(6):551-563. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1764411. Epub 2023 Jun 28. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2023. PMID: 37379867 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Value of serial CT scanning and intracranial pressure monitoring for detecting new intracranial mass effect in severe head injury patients showing lesions type I-II in the initial CT scan].Neurocirugia (Astur). 2005 Jun;16(3):217-34. Neurocirugia (Astur). 2005. PMID: 16007322 Review. Spanish.
Cited by
-
Validation of a Noninvasive Approach for Cerebrospinal Compliance Monitoring.Neurocrit Care. 2025 Aug;43(1):186-194. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-02205-w. Epub 2025 Feb 7. Neurocrit Care. 2025. PMID: 39920544
-
Clinical Performance of the Brain4care System for Noninvasive Detection of Intracranial Hypertension.Neurocrit Care. 2025 Apr 28. doi: 10.1007/s12028-025-02273-6. Online ahead of print. Neurocrit Care. 2025. PMID: 40293697
-
Low-Cost Strategies for the Development of Neurocritical Care in Resource-Limited Settings.Neurocrit Care. 2025 Jun;42(3):1087-1098. doi: 10.1007/s12028-025-02215-2. Epub 2025 Jan 28. Neurocrit Care. 2025. PMID: 39875681 Review.
-
The Neurological and Hemodynamics Safety of an Airway Clearance Technique in Patients with Acute Brain Injury: An Analysis of Intracranial Pressure Pulse Morphology Using a Non-Invasive Sensor.Sensors (Basel). 2024 Nov 2;24(21):7066. doi: 10.3390/s24217066. Sensors (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39517963 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Battaglini D, Anania P, Rocco PRM, et al. Escalate and de-escalate therapies for intracranial pressure control in traumatic brain injury. Front Neurol. 2020;11:1–17. - DOI
-
- Robba C, Citerio G. How I manage intracranial hypertension. Crit Care. 2019;23(1):1–3. - DOI
-
- Chung DY, Olson DWM, John S, et al. Evidence-based management of external ventricular drains. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-019-1009-9 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Battaglini D, Pelosi P, Robba C. The importance of neuromonitoring in non brain injured patients. Crit Care. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-03914-4 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials