Conducting research with Indigenous Peoples in Canada: ethical and policy considerations
- PMID: 38356990
- PMCID: PMC10866143
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1214121
Conducting research with Indigenous Peoples in Canada: ethical and policy considerations
Abstract
The international context of Indigenous mental health and wellbeing has been shaped by a number of key works recognizing Indigenous rights. Despite international recognitions, the mental health and wellness of Indigenous Peoples continues to be negatively affected by policies that ignore Indigenous rights, that frame colonization as historical rather than ongoing, or that minimize the impact of assimilation. Research institutions have a responsibility to conduct ethical research; yet institutional guidelines, principles, and policies often serve Indigenous Peoples poorly by enveloping them into Western knowledge production. To counter epistemological domination, Indigenous Peoples assert their research sovereignty, which for the purposes of this paper we define as autonomous control over research conducted on Indigenous territory or involving Indigenous Peoples. Indigenous sovereignty might also be applied to research impacting the landscape and the web of animal and spiritual lives evoked in a phrase such as "all my relations." This narrative review of material developed in the Canadian context examines the alignment with similar work in the international context to offer suggestions and a practice-based implementation tool to support Indigenous sovereignty in research related to wellness, mental health, and substance use. The compilation of key guidelines and principles in this article is only a start; addressing deeper issues requires a research paradigm shift.
Keywords: First Nations; Indigenous; ethics; guidelines; methodologies; policy; principles; research.
Copyright © 2024 Morisano, Robinson, Rush and Linklater.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The handling editor and reviewer SG-R declared a shared affiliation with the author DM at the time of review.
References
-
- Aboriginal Healing Foundation (2010). A compendium of Aboriginal Healing Foundation research. Aboriginal Healing Foundation research series. Available at: https://www.ahf.ca/files/research-compendium.pdf (Accessed October 13, 2023)
-
- Aboriginal Healing Foundation . (2017). FAQs. Available at: https://www.ahf.ca/faqs (Accessed October 13, 2023)
-
- Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies (AIATSIS) (2020). AIATSIS code of ethics for Aboriginal and Torres Strait islander research. Australia: AIATSIS.
-
- Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies (AIATSIS) and The Lowitja Institute (2013). Evaluation of the National Health and medical research council documents: Guidelines for ethical conduct in Aboriginal and Torres Strait islander Health Research 2004 (values and ethics) and keeping research on track: A guide for Aboriginal and Torres Strait islander Peoples about Health Research ethics 2005 (keeping research on track). NHMRC, Commonwealth of Australia: Canberra
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
