Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 22;5(4):e12209.
doi: 10.32872/cpe.12209. eCollection 2023 Dec.

Health Scares: Tracing Their Nature, Growth and Spread

Affiliations

Health Scares: Tracing Their Nature, Growth and Spread

Kate MacKrill et al. Clin Psychol Eur. .

Abstract

Background: Health scares are highly publicised threats to health that increase public concern and protective behaviours but are later shown to be unfounded. Although health scares have become more common in recent times, they have received very little research attention. This is despite the fact that health scares often have negative outcomes for individuals and community by affecting health behaviours and causing high levels of often unnecessary anxiety.

Method: In this paper we undertook a review and analysis of the major types of health scares as well as the background factors associated with health scares and their spread.

Results: We found most health scares fell into seven main categories; environmental contaminants, food, malicious incidents, medical treatments, public health interventions, radiation from technology and exotic diseases. For most health scares there are important background factors and incident characteristics that affect how they develop. Background factors include conspiracy theories, trust in governmental agencies, anxiety, modern health worries and wariness of chemicals. Incident characteristic include being newly developed, not understood or unseen, man-made rather than natural and whether the incident is out of personal control. We also identified the aspects of traditional and social media that exacerbate the rapid spread of health scares.

Conclusion: More research is needed to identify the characteristics of media stories that intensify the levels of public concern. Guidelines around the media's reporting of health incidents and potential health threats may be necessary in order to reduce levels of public anxiety and the negative public health impact of health scares.

Keywords: environmental incidents; health scares; media; nocebo effect; technology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aaronovitch, D. (2010). Voodoo histories: How conspiracy theory has shaped modern history. Random House.
    1. Ahmed, W., Vidal-Alaball, J., Downing, J., & Seguí, F. L. (2020). COVID-19 and the 5G conspiracy theory: Social network analysis of Twitter data. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(5), e19458. 10.2196/19458 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Armfield, J. M. (2007). When public action undermines public health: A critical examination of antifluoridationist literature. Australia and New Zealand Health Policy, 4(1), 25. 10.1186/1743-8462-4-25 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Banner, W. (2018). “Toxicohistrionics”: Flint, Michigan and the lead crisis. The Journal of Pediatrics, 197, 15–16. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.03.008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barsky, A. J., Saintfort, R., Rogers, M. P., & Borus, J. F. (2002). Nonspecific medication side effects and the nocebo phenomenon. Journal of the American Medical Association, 287(5), 622–627. 10.1001/jama.287.5.622 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources