Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb:10:e2300311.
doi: 10.1200/GO.23.00311.

Real-World Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake and Predictors of Visual Inspection With Acetic Acid Positivity Among Women Living With HIV in Care Programs in Western Kenya

Affiliations

Real-World Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake and Predictors of Visual Inspection With Acetic Acid Positivity Among Women Living With HIV in Care Programs in Western Kenya

Chemtai Mungo et al. JCO Glob Oncol. 2024 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: To achieve the WHO cervical cancer elimination targets, countries globally must achieve 70% cervical cancer screening (CCS) coverage. We evaluated CCS uptake and predictors of screening positive at two public HIV care programs in western Kenya.

Methods: From October 2007 to February 2019, data from the Family AIDS Care and Education Services (FACES) and Academic Model Providing Access to Healthcare (AMPATH) programs in western Kenya were analyzed. The study population included women age 18-65 years enrolled in HIV care. Screening uptake was calculated annually and overall, determining the proportion of eligible women screened. Multivariate logistic regression assessed predictors of positive screening outcomes.

Results: There were 57,298 women living with HIV (WLWHIV) eligible for CCS across both programs during the study period. The mean age was 31.4 years (IQR, 25.9-37.8), and 39% were on antiretroviral therapy (ART) at the first CCS-eligible visit. Of all eligible women, 29.4% (95% CI, 29.1 to 29.8) underwent CCS during the study period, 27.0% (95% CI, 26.5 to 27.4) in the AMPATH program, and 35.6% (95% CI, 34.9 to 36.4) in the FACES program. Annual screening uptake varied greatly in both programs, with coverage as low as 1% of eligible WLWHIV during specific years. Age at first screening, CD4 count within 90 days of screening, current use of ART, and program (AMPATH v FACES) were each statistically significant predictors of positive screening.

Conclusion: CCS uptake at two large HIV care programs in Kenya fell short of the WHO's 70% screening target. Screening rates varied significantly on the basis of the availability of funding specific to CCS, reflecting the limitations of vertical funding programs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Omenge Orang'o

Research Funding: MSD (Inst)

Constantin Yiannoutsos

Research Funding: National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) (Inst)

Craig R. Cohen

Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Osel Inc, Evvy Inc

Darron Brown

Employment: PDS, Inc

Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Pfizer, Johnson and Johnson

Honoraria: Merck

Consulting or Advisory Role: Merck

Research Funding: NCI (Inst), Merck (Inst)

Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Merck

No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Uptake of VIA screening among eligible women living with HIV by year at the AMPATH and the FACES programs in western Kenya between 2007 and 2019 (percent screened and 95% CIs). AMPATH, Academic Model Providing Access to Healthcare; FACES, Family AIDS Care and Education Services; VIA, visual inspection with acetic acid; WLHIV, women living with HIV.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. : Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71:209-249, 2021 - PubMed
    1. Kharsany ABM, Karim QA: HIV infection and AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa: Current status, challenges and opportunities. Open AIDS J 10:34-48, 2016 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Smith JS, Sanusi B, Swarts A, et al. : A randomized clinical trial comparing cervical dysplasia treatment with cryotherapy vs loop electrosurgical excision procedure in HIV-seropositive women from Johannesburg, South Africa. Am J Obstet Gynecol 217:183.e1-183.e11, 2017 - PubMed
    1. Dryden-Peterson S, Bvochora-Nsingo M, Suneja G, et al. : HIV infection and survival among women with cervical cancer. J Clin Oncol 34:3749-3757, 2016 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Frescura L, Godfrey-Faussett P, Feizzadeh A, et al. : Achieving the 95 95 95 targets for all: A pathway to ending AIDS. PLoS One 17:e0272405, 2022 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types