Comparison of two methods of sperm- and testis-mediated gene transfer in production of transgenic animals: A systematic review
- PMID: 38361185
- DOI: 10.1111/age.13404
Comparison of two methods of sperm- and testis-mediated gene transfer in production of transgenic animals: A systematic review
Abstract
Transgenic (Tg) animal technology is one of the growing areas in biology. Various Tg technologies, each with its own advantages and disadvantages, are available for generating Tg animals. These include zygote microinjection, electroporation, viral infection, embryonic stem cell or spermatogonial stem cell-mediated production of Tg animals, sperm-mediated gene transfer (SMGT), and testis-mediated gene transfer (TMGT). However, there are currently no comprehensive studies comparing SMGT and TMGT methods, selecting appropriate gene delivery carriers (such as nanoparticles and liposomes), and determining the optimal route for gene delivery (SMGT and TMGT) for producing Tg animal. Here we aim to provide a comprehensive assessment comparing SMGT and TMGT methods, and to introduce the best carriers and gene transfer methods to sperm and testis to generate Tg animals in different species. From 2010 to 2022, 47 studies on SMGT and 25 studies on TMGT have been conducted. Mice and rats were the most commonly used species in SMGT and TMGT. Regarding the SMGT approach, nanoparticles, streptolysin-O, and virus packaging were found to be the best gene transfer methods for generating Tg mice. In the TMGT method, the best gene transfer methods for generating Tg mice and rats were virus packaging, dimethyl sulfoxide, electroporation, and liposome. Our study has shown that the efficiency of producing Tg animals varies depending on the species, gene carrier, and method of gene transfer.
Keywords: nanoparticles; sperm‐mediated gene transfer; testis‐mediated gene transfer; transgenic animals; virus packaging.
© 2024 Stichting International Foundation for Animal Genetics.
Similar articles
-
In vivo gene transfer into testis and sperm: developments and future application.Arch Androl. 2007 Jul-Aug;53(4):187-97. doi: 10.1080/01485010701426455. Arch Androl. 2007. PMID: 17852043 Review.
-
Detection of transgene in progeny at different developmental stages following testis-mediated gene transfer.Mol Reprod Dev. 2001 Oct;60(2):196-201. doi: 10.1002/mrd.1077. Mol Reprod Dev. 2001. PMID: 11553918
-
Direct gene delivery to murine testis as a possible means of transfection of mature sperm and epithelial cells lining epididymal ducts.Reprod Med Biol. 2006 Mar 1;5(1):1-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0578.2006.00117.x. eCollection 2006 Mar. Reprod Med Biol. 2006. PMID: 29699231 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Improved expression of green fluorescent protein in cattle embryos produced by ICSI-mediated gene transfer with spermatozoa treated with streptolysin-O.Anim Reprod Sci. 2018 Sep;196:130-137. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2018.07.005. Epub 2018 Jul 17. Anim Reprod Sci. 2018. PMID: 30033189
-
Intratesticular injection followed by electroporation allows gene transfer in caprine spermatogenic cells.Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 16;8(1):3169. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-21558-9. Sci Rep. 2018. PMID: 29453369 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Establishment and Characteristics of the Spermatogonial Stem Cell Line from the Yellow River Carp (Cyprinus carpio haematopterus).Biology (Basel). 2025 May 12;14(5):536. doi: 10.3390/biology14050536. Biology (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40427727 Free PMC article.
-
Application of transgenic mice to the molecular pathogenesis of cataract.Int J Ophthalmol. 2024 Oct 18;17(10):1929-1948. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2024.10.21. eCollection 2024. Int J Ophthalmol. 2024. PMID: 39430018 Free PMC article. Review.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Abbasi, H., Hosseini, S.M., Hajian, M., Nasiri, Z., Bahadorani, M., Tahmoorespur, M. et al. (2015) Lentiviral vector‐mediated transduction of goat undifferentiated spermatogonia. Animal Reproduction Science, 163, 10–17.
-
- Al‐Shuhaib, M., Al‐Saadi, A., Ewadh, M. & Noor, M. (2014) Sperm mediated gene transfer in mammals; a versatile platform with multiple enhancements techniques. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare, 4, 58–68.
-
- Amaral, M.G., Campos, V.F., Seixas, F.K., Cavalcanti, P.V., Selau, L.P., Deschamps, J.C. et al. (2011) Testis‐mediated gene transfer in mice: comparison of transfection reagents regarding transgene transmission and testicular damage. Biological Research, 44(3), 229–234.
-
- Arias, M.E., Sánchez‐Villalba, E., Delgado, A. & Felmer, R. (2017) Effect of transfection and co‐incubation of bovine sperm with exogenous DNA on sperm quality and functional parameters for its use in sperm‐mediated gene transfer. Zygote, 25(1), 85–97.
-
- Atanassoff, A.P., Wolfmeier, H., Schoenauer, R., Hostettler, A., Ring, A., Draeger, A. et al. (2014) Microvesicle shedding and lysosomal repair fulfill divergent cellular needs during the repair of streptolysin O‐induced plasmalemmal damage. PLoS One, 9(2), e89743.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous