Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar;25(1-2):24-32.
doi: 10.1177/17571774231203387. Epub 2023 Nov 6.

Efficacy of facemasks in preventing transmission of COVID-19 in non-healthcare settings: A scoping review

Affiliations

Efficacy of facemasks in preventing transmission of COVID-19 in non-healthcare settings: A scoping review

Chloe Enright et al. J Infect Prev. 2024 Mar.

Abstract

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, an abundance of literature relating to the efficacy of face masks on reducing transmission of COVID-19 in non-healthcare settings emerged.

Aim/objective: The aim of this scoping review was to allow the identification of: types of evidence conducted in this area; knowledge gaps and common concepts relating to mask efficacy in non-healthcare settings.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase and the Irish Management Institute bibliographic database on December 15th, 2021. All types of face masks were included. Of 722 records, 16 were included after full text screening.

Findings/results: Themes from an adapted model of Howard et al. framework were used to group results and identify common concepts. The grouped thematic results were then applied to the socio-ecological model. This illustrated the multifactorial elements determining the efficacy of masks themselves while also illustrating how other factors such as individual behaviours, social interactions, settings and national policy can influence the degree of the protective effect.

Discussion: The findings from this scoping review indicate that an abundance of experimental literature is available indicating that masks are effective at preventing COVID-19 transmission but their degree of efficacy is impacted by external factors. This review highlights that the quality of the evidence available is low.

Keywords: COVID-19 3; Facemask 1; efficacy 2; mask 5; non-healthcare 6; non-healthcare 7; scoping 4; transmission 8.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PRISMA flow diagram for the study selection process.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
McLeroy’s SEM and Howard’s analytical framework themes combined.

References

    1. Abaluck J, Kwong LH, Styczynski A, et al. (2022) Impact of community masking on COVID-19: a cluster-randomized trial in Bangladesh. Science 375: eabi9069. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Álvarez-Pomar L, Rojas-Galeano S. (2021) Impact of personal protection habits on the spread of pandemics: insights from an agent-based model. The Scientific World Journal, 2021, 1, 14, 2021. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andrejko KL, Pry JM, Myers JF, et al. (2022) Effectiveness of face mask or respirator use in indoor public settings for prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection—California. February–December 2021 Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 71: 212–216. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arumuru V, Pasa J, Samantaray SS. (2020) Experimental visualization of sneezing and efficacy of face masks and shields. Physics of Fluids 32: 115129. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bandiera L, Pavar G, Pisetta G, et al. (2020) Face coverings and respiratory tract droplet dispersion. Royal Society Open Science 7: 201663. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources