Performance of far forward iceless blood storage containers in controlled cold environments
- PMID: 38362814
- DOI: 10.1111/trf.17745
Performance of far forward iceless blood storage containers in controlled cold environments
Abstract
Background: The Golden Hour Box (GHB), an iceless blood container designed for transfusion closest to the point of injury, is used by military medical teams in remote damage control resuscitation. While its performance is well-established in hot environments, it remains underexplored in cold conditions, a significant consideration in emerging global conflict zones.
Study design and methods: Four GHBs were preconditioned at +4°C or +18°C for 8 h and subsequently exposed to controlled laboratory simulated temperatures of -5, -15, and -25°C for 100 h. The study focused on their capability to maintain an internal temperature between +2 and +6°C, the recommended range for red blood cells unit storage and transport, using calibrated sensors for precise monitoring.
Results: When exposed to negative Celsius temperatures, GHBs showed varied performance depending on preconditioning temperatures. When preconditioned at +4°C, GHBs maintained an internal temperature within the target range (+2 to +6°C) for 100 h at -5°C, 52 ± 1 h at -15°C, and 29 ± 4 h at -25°C. In contrast, the internal temperature of GHBs preconditioned at +18°C exceeded this range in less than 30 min, then dropped below 2°C more rapidly than those preconditioned at +4°C, occurring within 20 ± 2 h at -15 and 13 ± 1 h at -25°C.
Conclusion: The GHB, when properly preconditioned, effectively maintains internal temperatures suitable for blood product transport in extreme cold. Future research, including analyses of blood performances, is still needed to validate these results in more realistic operational conditions for use in cold environments.
Keywords: cold temperatures; damage control; military trauma; severe hemorrhage; transfusion.
© 2024 AABB.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Eastridge BJ, Mabry RL, Seguin P, Cantrell J, Tops T, Uribe P, et al. Death on the battlefield (2001–2011): implications for the future of combat casualty care. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73:S431–S437.
-
- Mazuchowski EL, Kotwal RS, Janak JC, Howard JT, Harcke HT, Montgomery HR, et al. Mortality review of US special operations command battle‐injured fatalities. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020;88:686–695.
-
- Hoencamp R, Vermetten E, Tan ECTH, Putter H, Leenen LPH, Hamming JF. Systematic review of the prevalence and characteristics of battle casualties from NATO coalition forces in Iraq and Afghanistan. Injury. 2014;45:1028–1034.
-
- Leibner E, Andreae M, Galvagno SM, Scalea T. Damage control resuscitation. Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2020;7:5–13.
-
- Shackelford SA, del Junco DJ, Powell‐Dunford N, Mazuchowski EL, Howard JT, Kotwal RS, et al. Association of prehospital blood product transfusion during medical evacuation of combat casualties in Afghanistan with acute and 30‐day survival. JAMA. 2017;318:1581–1591.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources