Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Oct;25(4):2829-2844.
doi: 10.1177/15248380241227987. Epub 2024 Feb 16.

Effectiveness of Mental Health and Wellbeing Interventions for Children and Young People in Foster, Kinship, and Residential Care: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Effectiveness of Mental Health and Wellbeing Interventions for Children and Young People in Foster, Kinship, and Residential Care: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Rob Trubey et al. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2024 Oct.

Abstract

The mental health and wellbeing of children and young people who have been in care, primarily foster care, kinship care or residential care, remains a public health priority. The Care-experienced cHildren and young people's Interventions to improve Mental health and wEll-being outcomes Systematic review (CHIMES) synthesized evidence for the effectiveness of interventions targeting: subjective wellbeing; mental, behavioral and neurodevelopmental disorders; and suicide-related outcomes. Searches were conducted in 16 bibliographic databases and 22 websites between 1990 and 2022. This was supplemented by citation tracking, screening of relevant systematic reviews, and expert recommendation. We identified 35 interventions, with 44 evaluations via randomized controlled trials. Through meta-analyses, we found that interventions have a small beneficial impact on a variety of mental health outcomes in the short term (0-6 months). Interventions improved total social, emotional, and behavioral problems (d = -0.15, 95% CI [-0.28, -0.02]), social-emotional functioning difficulties (d = -0.18, 95% CI [-0.31, -0.05]), externalizing problem behaviors (d = -0.30, 95% CI [-0.53, -0.08]), internalizing problem behaviors (d = -0.35, 95% CI [-0.61, -0.08]); and depression and anxiety (d = -0.26, 95% CI [-0.40, -0.13]). Interventions did not demonstrate any effectiveness for outcomes assessed in the longer term (>6 months). Certainty of effectiveness was limited by risk of bias and imprecision. There was limited available evidence for interventions targeting subjective wellbeing and suicide-related outcomes. Future intervention design and delivery must ensure that programs are sufficient to activate causal mechanisms and facilitate change. Evaluation research should use a robust methodology.PROSPERO Registration: CRD42020177478.

Keywords: effectiveness; foster care; intervention; mental health; outcome; residential care; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Data availabilityExtracted data, analysis and syntheses are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram of study report retrieval.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Meta-analysis forest plots for total social, emotional, and behavioral problems: short-term and long-term outcomes.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Meta-analysis forest plots for total social-emotional functioning: shorter-term and longer-term outcomes.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Meta-analysis forest plots for internalizing problem behaviors: short-term and long-term outcomes.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Meta-analysis forest plots for externalizing problem behaviors: short-term and long-term outcomes.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Meta-analysis forest plots for anxiety and depression: short-term outcomes.

References

    1. Adkins T., Reisz S., Hasdemir D., Fonagy P. (2021). Family minds: A randomized controlled trial of a group intervention to improve foster parents’ reflective functioning. Development and Psychopathology, 34(3), 1177–1191. 10.1017/S095457942000214X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alderson H., Kaner E., Brown R., Howel D., McColl E., Smart D., Copello A., Fouweather T., McGovern R., Brown H., McArdle P., Lingam R. (2020). Behaviour change interventions to reduce risky substance use and improve mental health in children in care: The SOLID three-arm feasibility RCT. Public Health Research, 8, 13. 10.3310/phr08130 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Allik M., Brown D., Taylor Browne Lūka C., Macintyre C., Leyland A. H., Henderson M. (2021). Cohort profile: The “Children’s Health in Care in Scotland” (CHiCS) study-a longitudinal dataset to compare health outcomes for care experienced children and general population children. BMJ Open, 11(9), e054664. 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054664 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bergström M., Cederblad M., Håkansson K., Jonsson A. K., Munthe C., Vinnerljung B., Wirtberg I., Östlund P., Sundell K. (2019). Interventions in foster family care: A systematic review. Research on Social Work Practice, 30(1), 3–18. 10.1177/1049731519832101 - DOI
    1. Betzalel N., Shechtman Z. (2010). Bibliotherapy treatment for children with adjustment difficulties: A comparison of affective and cognitive bibliotherapy. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 5(4), 426–439. 10.1080/15401383.2010.527816 - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources