Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 May-Jun;41(3):423-437.
doi: 10.1111/phn.13291. Epub 2024 Feb 16.

Development and psychometric testing of physiopsychological disorders scale for medical rescuers fighting epidemics in China

Affiliations
Review

Development and psychometric testing of physiopsychological disorders scale for medical rescuers fighting epidemics in China

Hui Wang et al. Public Health Nurs. 2024 May-Jun.

Abstract

Objective: Develop and psychometrically test the physiopsychological disorders scale for medical rescuers fighting epidemics (PDS-MRFE).

Method: A three-phase approach was used to develop and test the physiopsychological disorders scale: (1) creating the item pool, (2) preliminarily evaluating items, and (3) refining the scale and estimating the psychometric properties. The items of the instrument were generated based on a comprehensive literature review and a qualitative study conducted with 31 medical rescuers (18 nurses and 13 doctors) fighting epidemics. A preliminary evaluation of items was conducted using content validity which was evaluated by a panel of 15 experts. Validity and reliability examinations were conducted to refine the scale and evaluate its psychometric properties. This was done using two different samples. Specifically, Sample A (360 medical rescuers) was employed for item reduction and exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and Sample B (287 medical rescuers) was employed for the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and determination of other psychometric properties (i.e., reliability, concurrent, convergent, and discriminant validity), which further confirmed the structure of the scale and evaluated its final psychometric properties.

Results: The final scale has 39 items with three subscales, including before, during, and after rescue. The exploratory factor analysis result indicated that the before-rescue scale of four items, during-rescue of 21 items, and after-rescue of 14 items explained 52.07%, 69.75%, and 52.30% of the cumulative variance, respectively. The confirmatory factor analysis result indicated that model fit indices of three subscales were acceptable and showed evidence of adequate content, convergent, discriminate, and concurrent validity. The Cronbach's α coefficients for each subscale and all dimensions ranged from 0.81 to 0.92, indicating good reliability for the PDS-MRFE.

Conclusions: The physiopsychological disorders scale is a psychometrically valid and reliable instrument and can be used in both clinical practice and research to evaluate different physiopsychological disorders at different medical rescue stages among medical rescuers fighting epidemics.

Keywords: epidemic; instrument development; medical rescuers; physiopsychological disorders; psychometric testing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

REFERENCES

    1. Abbas, M., Robalo Nunes, T., Martischang, R., Zingg, W., Iten, A., Pittet, D., & Harbarth, S. (2021). Nosocomial transmission and outbreaks of coronavirus disease 2019: The need to protect both patients and healthcare workers. Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control, 10(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756‐020‐00875‐7
    1. Abramowitz, J. S., Deacon, B. J., Olatunji, B. O., Wheaton, M. G., Berman, N. C., Losardo, D., Timpano, K. R., McGrath, P. B., Riemann, B. C., Adams, T., Björgvinsson, T., Storch, E. A., & Hale, L. R. (2010). Assessment of obsessive‐compulsive symptom dimensions: Development and evaluation of the Dimensional Obsessive‐Compulsive Scale. Psychological Assessment, 22(1), 180–198. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018260
    1. Alavi, M., Visentin, D. C., Thapa, D. K., Hunt, G. E., Watson, R., & Cleary, M. (2020). Exploratory factor analysis and principal component analysis in clinical studies: Which one should you use? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 76(8), 1886–1889. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14377
    1. Anggriani, R., Anggrawan, A., & Cahyadi, I. (2020). Structural analysis of the equation model on store atmosphere towards hedonic value and consumer impulsive buying (Study at Majapahit Food Center). Jurnal Varian, 4(1), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.30812/varian.v4i1.851
    1. Bagozzi, R. P. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement Error—A comment. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 375–381. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150979

LinkOut - more resources