Development and internal validation of machine learning models for personalized survival predictions in spinal cord glioma patients
- PMID: 38365005
- DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.02.002
Development and internal validation of machine learning models for personalized survival predictions in spinal cord glioma patients
Abstract
Background context: Numerous factors have been associated with the survival outcomes in patients with spinal cord gliomas (SCG). Recognizing these specific determinants is crucial, yet it is also vital to establish a reliable and precise prognostic model for estimating individual survival outcomes.
Objective: The objectives of this study are twofold: first, to create an array of interpretable machine learning (ML) models developed for predicting survival outcomes among SCG patients; and second, to integrate these models into an easily navigable online calculator to showcase their prospective clinical applicability.
Study design: This was a retrospective, population-based cohort study aiming to predict the outcomes of interest, which were binary categorical variables, in SCG patients with ML models.
Patient sample: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was utilized to identify adults aged 18 years or older who were diagnosed with histologically confirmed SCGs between 2010 and 2019.
Outcome measures: The outcomes of interest were survival outcomes at three specific time points postdiagnosis: 1, 3, and 5 years. These outcomes were formed by combining the "Vital Status" and "Last Contact or Death (Months from Diagnosis)" variables. Model performance was evaluated visually and numerically. The visual evaluation utilized receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, precision-recall curves (PRCs), and calibration curves. The numerical evaluation involved metrics such as sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, area under the PRC (AUPRC), area under the ROC curve (AUROC), and Brier Score.
Methods: We employed five ML algorithms-TabPFN, CatBoost, XGBoost, LightGBM, and Random Forest-along with the Optuna library for hyperparameter optimization. The models that yielded the highest AUROC values were chosen for integration into the online calculator. To enhance the explicability of our models, we utilized SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) for assessing the relative significance of predictor variables and incorporated partial dependence plots (PDPs) to delineate the influence of singular variables on the predictions made by the top performing models.
Results: For the 1-year survival analysis, 4,913 patients [5.6% with 1-year mortality]; for the 3-year survival analysis, 4,027 patients (11.5% with 3-year mortality]; and for the 5-year survival analysis, 2,854 patients (20.4% with 5-year mortality) were included. The top models achieved AUROCs of 0.938 for 1-year mortality (TabPFN), 0.907 for 3-year mortality (LightGBM), and 0.902 for 5-year mortality (Random Forest). Global SHAP analyses across survival outcomes at different time points identified histology, tumor grade, age, surgery, radiotherapy, and tumor size as the most significant predictor variables for the top-performing models.
Conclusions: This study demonstrates ML techniques can develop highly accurate prognostic models for SCG patients with excellent discriminatory ability. The interactive online calculator provides a tool for assessment by physicians (https://huggingface.co/spaces/MSHS-Neurosurgery-Research/NCDB-SCG). Local interpretability informs prediction influences for a given individual. External validation across diverse datasets could further substantiate potential utility and generalizability. This robust, interpretable methodology aligns with the goals of precision medicine, establishing a foundation for continued research leveraging ML's predictive power to enhance patient counseling.
Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Online calculator; Personalized medicine; Precision oncology; Prognostic modeling; Spinal glioma; Survival prediction.
Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Machine learning models on a web application to predict short-term postoperative outcomes following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 May 21;25(1):401. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07528-5. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024. PMID: 38773464 Free PMC article.
-
An Interpretable Machine Learning Approach to Predict Survival Outcomes in Spinal and Sacropelvic Chordomas.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2024 Apr 12. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005002. Online ahead of print. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2024. PMID: 38605635
-
Precision medicine for traumatic cervical spinal cord injuries: accessible and interpretable machine learning models to predict individualized in-hospital outcomes.Spine J. 2023 Dec;23(12):1750-1763. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.08.009. Epub 2023 Aug 23. Spine J. 2023. PMID: 37619871
-
Interpretable Machine Learning to Predict the Malignancy Risk of Follicular Thyroid Neoplasms in Extremely Unbalanced Data: Retrospective Cohort Study and Literature Review.JMIR Cancer. 2025 Feb 10;11:e66269. doi: 10.2196/66269. JMIR Cancer. 2025. PMID: 39930991 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Predicting survival in malignant glioma using artificial intelligence.Eur J Med Res. 2025 Jan 31;30(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02339-3. Eur J Med Res. 2025. PMID: 39891313 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The Application of Artificial Intelligence in Spine Surgery: A Scoping Review.J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2025 Apr 10;9(4):e24.00405. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00405. eCollection 2025 Apr 1. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2025. PMID: 40239218 Free PMC article.
-
Machine learning-based diagnostic prediction of minimal change disease: model development study.Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 8;14(1):23460. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73898-4. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39379539 Free PMC article.
-
Artificial Intelligence in Surgery: A Systematic Review of Use and Validation.J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 24;13(23):7108. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237108. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39685566 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources