Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2024 Jul;166(1):107-117.
doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.02.015. Epub 2024 Feb 15.

Achieving Goals of Care Decisions in Chronic Critical Illness: A Multi-Institutional Qualitative Study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Achieving Goals of Care Decisions in Chronic Critical Illness: A Multi-Institutional Qualitative Study

Sarah K Andersen et al. Chest. 2024 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Physicians, patients, and families alike perceive a need to improve how goals of care (GOC) decisions occur in chronic critical illness (CCI), but little is currently known about this decision-making process.

Research question: How do intensivists from various health systems facilitate decision-making about GOC for patients with CCI? What are barriers to, and facilitators of, this decision-making process?

Study design and methods: We conducted semistructured interviews with a purposeful sample of intensivists from the United States and Canada using a mental models approach adapted from decision science. We analyzed transcripts inductively using qualitative description.

Results: We interviewed 29 intensivists from six institutions. Participants across all sites described GOC decision-making in CCI as a complex, longitudinal, and iterative process that involved substantial preparatory work, numerous stakeholders, and multiple family meetings. Intensivists required considerable time to collect information on prior events and conversations, and to arrive at a prognostic consensus with other involved physicians prior to meeting with families. Many intensivists stressed the importance of scheduling multiple family meetings to build trust and relationships prior to explicitly discussing GOC. Physician-identified barriers to GOC decision-making included 1-week staffing models, limited time and cognitive bandwidth, difficulty eliciting patient values, and interpersonal challenges with care team members or families. Potential facilitators included scheduled family meetings at regular intervals, greater interprofessional involvement in decisions, and consistent messaging from care team members.

Interpretation: Intensivists described a complex time- and labor-intensive group process to achieve GOC decision-making in CCI. System-level interventions that improve how information is shared between physicians and decrease logistical and relational barriers to timely and consistent communication are key to improving GOC decision-making in CCI.

Keywords: chronic critical illness; communication; critical care; decision-making; goals of care; intensive care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Financial/Nonfinancial Disclosures None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Physician-derived model of goals of care (GOC) decision-making process in chronic critical illness (CCI). Making GOC decisions in CCI is perceived to be a complex, longitudinal, and iterative process. Intensivists must coordinate with diverse clinical stakeholders, gather pertinent information from the medical record, and simultaneously build trust and relationships with families prior to explicitly addressing GOC.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Process-level interventions to improve GOC decision-making in chronic critical illness. Interventions may have multiple, overlapping beneficial effects on the decision-making process. GOC = goals of care.
Supplemental Figure
Supplemental Figure

References

    1. Zilberberg M.D., de Wit M., Pirone J.R., Shorr A.F. Growth in adult prolonged acute mechanical ventilation: implications for healthcare delivery. Crit Care Med. 2008;36(5):1451–1455. - PubMed
    1. Nelson J.E., Cox C.E., Hope A.A., Carson S.S. Chronic critical illness. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;182(4):446–454. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kahn J.M., Le T., Angus D.C., et al. The epidemiology of chronic critical illness in the United States∗. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(2):282–287. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dale C.M., Carbone S., Istanboulian L., et al. Support needs and health-related quality of life of family caregivers of patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation and admission to a specialised weaning centre: a qualitative longitudinal interview study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2020;58 - PubMed
    1. Nelson J.E., Kinjo K., Meier D.E., Ahmad K., Morrison R.S. When critical illness becomes chronic: informational needs of patients and families. J Crit Care. 2005;20(1):79–89. - PubMed

Publication types