Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 16;9(2):e014100.
doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014100.

Why a good law is not always good enough: a global review of restrictions to supportive laws for sexual and reproductive health and rights

Laura Ferguson  1 , Michelle Elizabeth Anderson  2 , Mengjia Liang  3 , Emilie Filmer-Wilson  3
Affiliations

Why a good law is not always good enough: a global review of restrictions to supportive laws for sexual and reproductive health and rights

Laura Ferguson et al. BMJ Glob Health. .

Abstract

Laws and regulations provide the framework for implementing sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR)-related policies, programmes and services. They can promote the fulfilment of health and human rights; however, they may also limit the achievement of these goals. This study uses data collected under Sustainable Development Goal Indicator 5.6.2 to analyse SRHR-related laws and restrictions from 153 countries. Looking beyond the existence of supportive laws to assess the constellation of legal restrictions and contradictions such as criminalisation and plural legal systems provides a more nuanced understanding of factors involved in achieving full and equal access to SRHR.The interaction between restrictions and contradictions within the law disproportionately impacts some populations' health access and outcomes. Restrictions based on third-party authorisations and age are the most common restriction types, disproportionately impacting young women. Contraception, emergency contraception and abortion face the greatest number of restrictions, indicating a significant layering of barriers to family planning services. Further, plural legal systems commonly contradict guarantees of contraceptive services and emergency contraception. Our analyses suggest that one of the populations most affected by restrictions to SRH services as they appear in legal and regulatory frameworks is adolescent girls and young women in sub-Saharan Africa seeking abortion or contraceptive services.Study findings provide a critical starting point for advocacy to address legal barriers to SRH services and evidence for future policy and programming. For individual countries, this study can serve as a model for analysis of their own legal and regulatory frameworks to identify priority areas for reform efforts.

Keywords: HIV; Health policy; Maternal health; Public Health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Analysis of overlapping barriers to accessing family planning
Figure 2
Figure 2
Number of countries with plural legal systems that may impede implementation of a law, by component. CSE, comprehensive sexuality education; HPV, human papillomavirus
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. United Nations Population Fund, editor . Programme of action adopted at the International conference of population and development, Cairo 5-13 Sep 1994. New York: United Nations Population Fund; 1996.
    1. World Health Organization . Human rights. 2022. Available: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/human-rights-and-health [Accessed 10 Dec 2022].
    1. U.N. Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women . Concluding observations of the committee on the elimination of discrimination against women. Report no.: CEDAW /C/NZL/CO/7. New Zealand: United Nations; 2012.
    1. U.N. Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights . General comment No.22 (2016) on the right to sexual and reproductive health (article 12 of the International covenant on economic, social and cultural rights). United Nations, Contract no.: E/C.12/GC/22; 2016.
    1. Ferguson L, Jardell W, Lambert-Peck M, et al. . Mind the gap: understanding differences between sexual and reproductive health-related legal frameworks on paper and in practice. Front Glob Womens Health 2022;3:838976. 10.3389/fgwh.2022.838976 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources