A prospective cohort study on perioperative percutaneous balloon compression for trigeminal neuralgia: safety and efficacy analysis
- PMID: 38366200
- DOI: 10.1007/s10143-024-02323-1
A prospective cohort study on perioperative percutaneous balloon compression for trigeminal neuralgia: safety and efficacy analysis
Abstract
With the recent emergence of percutaneous balloon compression (PBC) as a promising treatment for trigeminal neuralgia (TN), there is a growing need for research on its safety and efficacy. This study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of PBC in the treatment of TN patients during the perioperative period. This study involved a total of 400 TN patients who were selected and treated with PBC at our institution. The clinical data and short-term outcomes were analyzed based on sex, initial PBC treatment for TN, and subsequent PBC treatment for recurrent TN after previous PBC or microvascular decompression (MVD) or radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFT). No statistically significant difference was found when comparing postoperative pain relief between male and female patients with TN. Nevertheless, female patients were found to be more vulnerable than male patients to abnormal facial sensations (P = 0.001), diplopia (P = 0.015), postoperative headache (P = 0.012), and hyposmia (P = 0.029). Additionally, it was observed that there was no substantial difference in the postoperative pain relief rate between the first-time PBC group and PBC for recurrent TN patients postoperatively following procedures such as PBC, MVD, and RFT. In conclusion, this study has shown that PBC treatment is effective in managing TN in both males and females, regardless of whether the treatment was administered as a primary intervention or following prior surgical procedures such as PBC, MVD, or RFT. Nonetheless, it is noted that the risk of postoperative complications appears to be higher in female patients compared to male patients.
Keywords: Efficacy; Percutaneous balloon compression; Perioperative period; Safety; Trigeminal neuralgia.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Tohyama S, Hung PS, Cheng JC, Zhang JY, Halawani A, Mikulis DJ, Oh J, Hodaie M (2020) Trigeminal neuralgia associated with a solitary pontine lesion: clinical and neuroimaging definition of a new syndrome. Pain 161(5):916–925. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001777 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Di Stefano G, Truini A, Cruccu G (2018) Current and innovative pharmacological options to treat typical and atypical trigeminal neuralgia. Drugs 78(14):1433–1442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-018-0964-9 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Heinskou TB, Maarbjerg S, Wolfram F, Rochat P, Brennum J, Olesen J, Bendtsen L (2019) Favourable prognosis of trigeminal neuralgia when enrolled in a multidisciplinary management program - a two-year prospective real-life study. J Headache Pain 20(1):23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-019-0973-4 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Obermann M (2010) Treatment options in trigeminal neuralgia. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 3(2):107–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1756285609359317 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Urgosik D, Liscak R, Novotny J Jr, Vymazal J, Vladyka V (2005) Treatment of essential trigeminal neuralgia with gamma knife surgery. J Neurosurg 102:29–33. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2005.102.s_supplement.0029 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
