Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr;33(4):1607-1616.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08145-5. Epub 2024 Feb 17.

Validation of the AO Spine CROST (Clinician Reported Outcome Spine Trauma) in the clinical setting

Affiliations
Free article

Validation of the AO Spine CROST (Clinician Reported Outcome Spine Trauma) in the clinical setting

Said Sadiqi et al. Eur Spine J. 2024 Apr.
Free article

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate feasibility, internal consistency, inter-rater reliability, and prospective validity of AO Spine CROST (Clinician Reported Outcome Spine Trauma) in the clinical setting.

Methods: Patients were included from four trauma centers. Two surgeons with substantial amount of experience in spine trauma care were included from each center. Two separate questionnaires were administered at baseline, 6-months and 1-year: one to surgeons (mainly CROST) and another to patients (AO Spine PROST-Patient Reported Outcome Spine Trauma). Descriptive statistics were used to analyze patient characteristics and feasibility, Cronbach's α for internal consistency. Inter-rater reliability through exact agreement, Kappa statistics and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Prospective analysis, and relationships between CROST and PROST were explored through descriptive statistics and Spearman correlations.

Results: In total, 92 patients were included. CROST showed excellent feasibility results. Internal consistency (α = 0.58-0.70) and reliability (ICC = 0.52 and 0.55) were moderate. Mean total scores between surgeons only differed 0.2-0.9 with exact agreement 48.9-57.6%. Exact agreement per CROST item showed good results (73.9-98.9%). Kappa statistics revealed moderate agreement for most CROST items. In the prospective analysis a trend was only seen when no concerns at all were expressed by the surgeon (CROST = 0), and moderate to strong positive Spearman correlations were found between CROST at baseline and the scores at follow-up (rs = 0.41-0.64). Comparing the CROST with PROST showed no specific association, nor any Spearman correlations (rs = -0.33-0.07).

Conclusions: The AO Spine CROST showed moderate validity in a true clinical setting including patients from the daily clinical practice.

Keywords: AO Spine CROST; Clinician perspective; Function; Health; Outcome instrument; Spine trauma.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Oner C, Rajasekaran S, Chapman JR, Fehlings MG, Vaccaro AR, Schroeder GD et al (2017) Spine trauma-what are the current controversies? J Orthop Trauma 31(Suppl 4):S1–S6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Oner C, Sadiqi S, Lehr AM, Schroeder GD, Vaccaro AR (2017) The need of validated disease-specific outcome instruments for spine trauma. J Orthop Trauma 31(Suppl 4):S33–S37 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sadiqi S, Lehr AM, Post MW, Dvorak MF, Kandziora F, Rajasekaran S et al (2017) Development of the AOSpine Patient Reported Outcome Spine Trauma (AOSpine PROST): a universal disease-specific outcome instrument for individuals with traumatic spinal column injury. Eur Spine J 26(5):1550–1557 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nygaard OP, Kloster R, Dullerud R, Jacobsen EA, Mellgren SI (1997) No association between peridural scar and outcome after lumbar microdiscectomy. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 139(12):1095–1100 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Witt I, Vestergaard A, Rosenklint A (1984) A comparative analysis of x-ray findings of the lumbar spine in patients with and without lumbar pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 9(3):298–300