Systematic review of automatic post-stroke gait classification systems

Abstract

Background: Gait classification is a clinically helpful task performed after a stroke in order to guide rehabilitation therapy. Gait disorders are commonly identified using observational gait analysis in clinical settings, but this approach is limited due to low reliability and accuracy. Data-driven gait classification can quantify gait deviations and categorise gait patterns automatically possibly improving reliability and accuracy; however, the development and clinical utility of current data driven systems has not been reviewed previously.

Research question: The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the literature surrounding the methodology used to develop automatic gait classification systems, and their potential effectiveness in the clinical management of stroke-affected gait.

Method: The database search included PubMed, IEEE Xplore, and Scopus. Twenty-one studies were identified through inclusion and exclusion criteria from 407 available studies published between 2015 and 2022. Development methodology, classification performance, and clinical utility information were extracted for review.

Results and significance: Most of gait classification systems reported a classification accuracy between 80%-100%. However, collated studies presented methodological errors in machine learning (ML) model development. Further, many studies neglected model components such as clinical utility (e.g., predictions don't assist clinicians or therapists in making decisions, interpretability, and generalisability). We provided recommendations to guide development of future post-stroke automatic gait classification systems to better assist clinicians and therapists. Future automatic gait classification systems should emphasise the clinical significance and adopt a standardised development methodology of ML model.

Keywords: Gait analysis; Gait assessment; Hemiplegic gait; Machine learning.